High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 12 BOM CK 0153

Sakib Khan vs State Of Maharashtra

Bombay High Court · Decided on 29 December 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prithviraj K. Chavan, J
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3157 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 433 words

Prithviraj K. Chavan, J

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants, who are husband and wife. A crime bearing No. 1448 of 2021 came to be registered with Malvani

Police Station against the applicants for the offences punishable under Sections 325, 324, 323, 504, 506 (II) r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

It is alleged that the complainant had borrowed an amount of Rs.80,000/- from applicant no.2. Despite transferring the amount in the account of

applicant no.2 with the ICICI Bank on 18th October, 2021, it is alleged that the applicants assaulted the complainant’s father by inflicting fist blow

resulting into uprooting of his 8 artificial teeth. It is the contention of the applicants that they too have registered an FIR against the complainant qua

the same incident.

3.

Heard Mr. Mishra, the learned Counsel for the applicants.

4.

The applicants seeks interim protection by contending that they would co-operate with the Investigating Officer and would not flee away from

justice till the investigation is completed. It is submitted that the applicants have roots in the society and they are law abiding citizens.

5.

On the other hand, the learned APP, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, submits that the applicants are not

co-operating in the investigation. It is submitted that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is required for recovery of the weapon used by the

applicant no.2 in committing the offence.

6.

Having considered the respective submissions, in my view, the applicants can be protected by an interim order as there are no antecedents and it

appears to be a dispute arose on account of lending of some amount by the applicants to the complainant. Under such circumstances, the following

order is expedient :-

ORDER

(i) In the event of their arrests, the applicants be enlarged on bail on furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-each with one surety in the like

amount.

(ii) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation on 1st January, 2022, 6th January, 2022 and 12th January, 2022 between 10.00

a.m. to 12.00 noon.

(iii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to the complainant or the witnesses.

(iv) The applicants shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(v) The applicants shall deposit their passports, if any, with the Investigating Officer.

(vi) The applicants shall remain present at the time of final hearing of the application, in view of the request made by the learned Additional Public

Prosecutor.

(vii) Stand over to 14th January, 2022.