AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
The plaintiffs filed this suit praying for various reliefs with regard to an ancient temple of Shri Martand Dev which had been managed by a Committee of five trustees since the year 1841. They asked the sanction of the Collector u/s 92 of the CPC for the institution of the suit for the purpose of obtaining the five reliefs set out in the application. The Collector replied that sanction was only given to the institution of a suit for the specific purpose of settling a scheme. In spite of that order the plaint was filed on the 12th February 1921 asking, in addition to the prayer for a settlement of the scheme, for the other reliefs for which sanction had been refused by the Collector. That, no doubt, was very improper. It did not follow on that account that the plaintiffs suit, so far as it was covered by the Collector''s sanction, was not entitled to be heard on its merits. Therefore, the appeal must be allowed and the case must be remained to the District Judge to be heard on the merits with regard to the plaintiffs prayer that a scheme should be settled to secure the good management of the Samthan in future.
Defendants are entitled to their costs in this Court. Costs of the lower Court to be costs in the cause.