High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 09 CHH CK 0270

Sahadev vs A. Mahesh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 17 September 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WP227 No. 695 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 155 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

By the impugned order dated 05.07.2018, learned Claims Tribunal has rejected the petitioner's application for disbursement of the compensation

amount fixed deposited against which this writ petition has been preferred.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Claims Tribunal ought to have considered petitioner's application and therefore, impugned order

is unsustainable and bad in law.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

4.

The learned Claims Tribunal has not considered the application filed by the petitioner demonstrating his need for the said money in proper

perspective, therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to make fresh application before the Claims Tribunal within a period of 10 days from today that will

be considered and decided in accordance with law by the Claims Tribunal expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).