High Courts(2010) 09 MAD CK 0017

S. Thirumoorthy vs The Superintendent of Police District Police Officer

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 September 2010

CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 19405 and M.P. No''s. 1 and 2 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 317 words
1.

The prayer in the Writ Petition is to quash the order of suspension dated 02.12.2008 placing the petitioner under suspension on the ground that

he has involved in a criminal case in Erode District Vigilance and Anti-Corruption in Cr. No. 18/2008, registered u/s 7 of Prevention of Corruption

Act, 1988 and he was arrested on 01.12.2008 at about 22.25 hours and remanded before the Chief Judicial Magistrate and Special Judge,

Erode, on 02.12.2008. Since the investigation is pending the petitioner was placed under suspension by virtue of the powers conferred under Rule

3(e)(1)(ii) of TNPSS (D and A) Rules, 1955, until further orders.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge sheet has been filed in the Criminal Case on 08.03.2010 before the Chief Judicial

Magistrate and Special-Judge, Erode and the case is pending trial. The learned Counsel further submits that since the charge sheet is filed, the

petitioner is not pressing the prayer as such and the petitioner will be satisfied if the respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted

by the petitioner dated 06.09.2010 seeking review of the order of suspension. The said submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner

is recorded.

3.

In the light of the said submission, the learned Counsel for the respondent is directed to take notice, who in turn submits that six weeks time may

be given to consider the representation dated 06.09.2010 seeking review of the order of suspension.

4.

In view of the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of, with direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner

dated 06.09.2010 seeking review of the suspension order and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected M.P. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2010 are closed. No costs.