AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Markandey Katju, C.J.—This writ appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 20-2-2004. Heard the learned counsel for the
parties and perused the records. It appears that writ petition, W.P. No.3967 of 2003 filed by the appellant had been dismissed by the learned
single Judge on 7-11-2003. No writ appeal was filed against that order in this Court nor was any SLP filed against it in the Supreme Court.
Instead, the writ-petitioner filed a review petition, which has been dismissed by the impugned order dated 20-2-2004. Against the dismissal of the
review application, the present appeal has been filed.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. We do not find any merit in this appeal. In this appeal, learned counsel for the appellant challenges
the order dated 7-11-2003 passed in the writ petition. He could have filed a writ appeal against that order. He did not do so and instead filed a
review petition before the learned single Judge, which was also dismissed. The scope of challenge in a review petition is very limited. We find no
error apparent on the face of the record in the order dated 7-11-2003. The writ appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Connected W.A.M.P. No.7016
of 2004 is closed.
