High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 08 MAD CK 0046

S. Nahomi vs The Commissioner, Directorate of Stationery and Printing and Ms. Tamil Selvi

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 August 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod K. Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 11976 of 2008 and MP (MD) No. 1 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 203 words

Vinod K. Sharma, J.—The Petitioner seeks a Writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order passed by the first Respondent,

directing the payment of 50% of the DCRG benefit in favour of Respondent No. 2.

2.

It is not disputed that there is a dispute with regard to inheritance of Late.Shri.Sathyaseelan, is pending in the Civil Court.

3.

The Petitioner prays for release the retrial benefits to her being the nominee, whereas, the Respondent No. 2 is claiming the amount being the

legal representative i.e., wife of Late. Shri. Sathyaseelan.

4.

The suit with regard to the entitlement to recover the retrial benefits and status of Respondent No. 2 as wife is pending in the Civil Court.

5.

The Petitioner has an alternative remedy to seek requisite relief from the Civil Court in the pending suit or file a cross-suit.

6.

The dispute raised in this Writ Petition admittedly is pending in the Civil suit therefore, this Writ Petition being not competent, is ordered to be

dismissed, with liberty to the Petitioner to take appropriate steps to protect her interest in the Civil Suit, or by filing cross-suit before the Civil

Court.

7.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No. costs.