High Courts(1924) 04 MAD CK 0044

S. Gangaraju Bahadur and Others vs V. Ramachandra Deo Maharajulum

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 April 1924 · Citation: AIR 1925 Mad 187 : (1924) 20 LW 753

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 162 words
1.

The respondent contends that this application does not lie u/s 109tJ Civil Procedure Code, and this Court cannot grant leave. We think this

contention is well founded. The order sought to be appealed against was an order passed by us, on an application to pass a final decree, in terms

of a preliminary decree of the Privy Council, or to transmit the records to the Subordinate Judge to pass such a decree; we made an order so

transmitting, but in doing so we overruled an objection that the suit had abated. Ours was not an order passed by us on appeal, so as to fall within

Clause (a) of Section 109, Civil Procedure Code; and we are not prepared, to certify the case, as a fit one for appeal, under Clause (c), as the

appeal relates to a pure technicality and there is no substantial question of law involved in it.

2.

The petition therefore fails and is dismissed with costs.