High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 KAR CK 0051

S. Chennaraya Reddy & Ors. vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike & Ors.

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 14 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vineet Kothari
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
9870-9882 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 189 words
1.

The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petitions is that the Respondent - ARO has not decided the Objections of the petitioners in

pursuance of the Show Cause Notices issued to the petitioners on various dates regarding the Property Tax.

2.

The petitioners have submitted before the Court that no such Property Tax would be payable by the petitioners.

3.

However, from the body of the writ petition, it is clear that though the petitioners have filed their Objections before the said Respondent No.2 -

ARO, no adjudication order has yet been passed by the said Authority.

4.

These writ petitions therefore are premature and the same deserve to be disposed of with a liberty and direction to the petitioners to appear

before the said Authority and the Respondent No.2 -ARO, Yelahanka Sub-Division, BBMP is directed to pass appropriate speaking order in the

matter within a period of six weeks from today.

5.

The petitioners are directed to appear in the first instance before the said Authority on 26-02-2018 at 11:00 A.M.

6.

With the above observations, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs.