High CourtsDivision Bench(1999) 04 MAD CK 0160

Rukmani Kannan Vidyalaya Trust vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 April 1999 · Citation: (2001) 249 ITR 111 : (2002) 120 TAXMAN 854

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Jayasimha Babu, J · A. Subbulakshmy, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case Petition No''s. 4 to 11 of 1999

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 280 words

R. Jayasimha, J.—We have heard counsel for the parties. We are satisfied that the questions proposed do require consideration by this court.

2.

The Tribunal is directed to refer the following questions :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the income of the trust from Kindergarten section is not entitled to exemption as running of a Kindergarten schools is not within the ambit of the trust''s objects ?

2.

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the entire income of the trust has riot been utilised for education activities and as such, the income from Kindergarten school and the ladies hostel is not exempt ?

3.

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the income from the ladies hostel as it is not entitled for exemption as it is not a charitable object and involves an activity for profit ?

4.

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in rendering such a finding without adverting to the evidence and findings recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ?

5.

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the rectification made to the objects of the trust cannot have any retrospective operation ?"

3.

The Tribunal is directed to submit a statement of case together with material as is relevant for the purpose of deciding the questions.