High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 DEL CK 4321

Rukhsana vs State Of NCT Of Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 29 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Girish Kathpalia, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
BAIL APPLN. 4615/2026 & CRL.M.A. 33889/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 346 words
1.

The accused/applicant seeks grant of interim bail for a period of 03 months in case FIR No. 153/2022 of PS Defence Colony for offence under Section 363/342/328/366A/370/376/506/120B/34 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/Inspector Pankaj Pandey.

3.

Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that she is a part of co-accused group which sexually exploited three young girls, who were raped in presence of the accused/applicant so that they would be forced into flesh trade. It is alleged that rape of those minor girls took place in presence of the accused/applicant. The interim bail sought in the present application is on the ground that daughter of the accused/applicant is in advanced stage of pregnancy and needs the accused/applicant for her support.

4.

Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that the regular bail application of the accused/applicant is listed before this court on 25.11.2026. It is also submitted that on humanitarian grounds the accused/applicant deserves interim bail for a period of three months so that she may take care of her pregnant daughter. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the accused/applicant that the chargesheet does not reflect that rape of those girls occurred in presence of the accused/applicant.

5.

Learned APP for State, on instructions of the IO, submits that daughter of the accused/applicant is residing with her marital family consisting of number of family members including her mother-in-law, who are always available to take care of daughter of the accused/applicant. It is also submitted that the humanitarian consideration cannot be de hors the gravity of offence alleged against the accused/applicant, which offence is her involvement to push three minor aged girls into prostitution.

6.

Keeping in mind the above circumstances, I do not find it to be a case of such emergent situation that requires personal presence of the accused/applicant. Therefore, the interim bail application and accompanying application are dismissed.

7.

Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for being informed to the accused/applicant.