High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 06 MAD CK 0134

R.Subbukalai vs The Superintendent of Police, & Anr.

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Selvam, N.Authinathan
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
10678 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 207 words
1.

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the order dated 05.06.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and also for directing the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Adalpadal Kalai Nikalchi programme in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus.

2.

Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

3.

It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for the purpose mentioned therein, but the second respondent has rejected the same by way of passing the impugned order dated 05.06.2017, wherein it has been simply stated that due to law and order problem, permission cannot be granted. The reason assigned by the second respondent cannot be accepted and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order.

4.

In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 05.06.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders on merits within a period of two days.