High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 CHH CK 0336

R.R. Bhagwan vs Union Of India And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 28 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 1640 Of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 346 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

The relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for grant

of the benefits attached to the Assured Career Progressive (hereinafter referred to as ""ACP"") Scheme for the central government civil employees.

2.

The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been granted the benefits under the ACP scheme with effect from

8.7.2003. However, after having drawn the benefits for about 3 years, it was finally withdrawn by the respondents in April, 2005 holding that the

petitioner would be entitled for the benefits under the said scheme only from April, 2005 and not from April, 2003 as the petitioner has not cleared the

9mm pistol firing test which he was otherwise supposed to, enabling him to get the benefits of the ACP scheme. The said test of 9mm pistol firing was

cleared by the petitioner only on 5.4.2005 and thereafter the respondents have cleared the benefits of the ACP scheme to the petitioner and for the

previous period i.e. from 8.7.2003 to 5.4.2005 they have recovered the monetary benefits provided to the petitioner.

3.

Counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time finally prays that let the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to

consider and decide the representation of the petitioner which he has filed on 25.10.2008 which till date has not been rejected by the respondents.

4.

Given the said limited prayer of the petitioner, the writ petition itself is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.4 to consider and decide the

case of the petitioner in the light of the provisions of the ACP scheme, and in case if he is entitled for any benefit the same be extended to him and in

case if he is not entitled under the scheme then he be intimated suitably in writing. Let this be done at the at earliest.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.