AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant against the petitioners, petition enquiry is pending in CP No.51 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.
The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the police for enquiry and at the time of conducting of the enquiry, the petitioner shall not be harassed by the police. The police cannot call the petitioner on a regular basis in the guise of enquiry without even registering an FIR and the Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353 has enumerated the nature of cases where preliminary enquiry can be conducted and has also restricted the period, for which preliminary enquiry can be conducted. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondents are free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against the respondents proceeding to take action in accordance with law.
5.With the above directions, the Criminal Original Petition is closed.