High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 SHI CK 0466

Rozi Sadana vs Union Of India & Ors.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla · Decided on 7 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CWP No.1286 of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 282 words

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

Mr. Sudhir Thakur, learned Senior Counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, fairly states that grievance of the petitioner has been partially addressed, inasmuch as she has been paid compensation for the land used for construction of the National Highway. He states that now the dispute remains with regard to damage caused to rest of her land on account of unscientific cutting and throwing of the debris and as such, Committee Constituted under the Chairmanship of the Deputy Commissioner, Solan, which is otherwise authorized to assess the damage, if any, caused to the property beyond right of way be directed to treat the present petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and decide the same in a time bound manner.

2.

Learned counsel representing the respondents are not averse to aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.

3.

Consequently, In view of the above, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Committee notified under notification dated 08.06.2020 headed by the Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district, to treat the present petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and thereafter, assess the damage, if any, caused to the property of the petitioner beyond the right of way or for removal of debris allegedly thrown by respondent No.2-NHAI. The Committee shall decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Needless to say, authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of the instant order shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as other stakeholders. Liberty is also reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate court of law if she still remains aggrieved.