High CourtsDivision Bench(1913) 02 CAL CK 0032

Roshanulla vs Hazir Mahmud and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 17 February 1913 · Citation: 18 Ind. Cas. 727

HON’BLE JUDGES
Stephen, J · N. Chatterjea, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 91 words
1.

This was a Rule calling upon the opposite party to show cause why the order should not be set aside on the ground that it had not been shown that the petitioner was dispossessed in due course of law.

2.

On the facts of the case, it appears that the petitioner was dispossessed by a legal process but one which ought not to have been applied. The result is that the Rule is made absolute and the case is remanded to the lower Court to be re-tried according to law.