High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 03 DEL CK 0256

Rohit Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 5 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2000 Of 2018, Civil Miscellaneous No. 8233 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 356 words

Sunil Gaur, J

1.

A mandamus is sought to third respondent to evaluate petitioner’s OMR Sheet and to appoint him on the post of Optical Worker if he has

qualified. In pursuance of Advertisement (Annexure P-1) petitioner had applied for the post of Optical Worker and as per the List of Candidature

Cancelled (Annexure P-6), petitioner’s Answer-sheet was not evaluated due to “MISSING QP SERIESâ€​.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that it was due to inadvertence that the Question Paper Series was not mentioned by petitioner on his

Answer-sheet and on account of this inadvertent error, petitioner ought not to suffer. To submit so, reliance is placed upon decision of a Division

Bench of this Court in Union of India and Ors. v. Sumit Kumar, 2017 SCC Onlince Del 10138.

3.

Learned counsel for respondents submits that the list of disqualified candidates (Annexure P-6) was made public way back in September, 2017 and

so, this petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. It is pointed out by learned counsel for respondents that it was made clear

in the OMR Sheet that if any details of question booklet series, etc., are not filled up by the candidates, then the Answer-sheets would not be

evaluated under any circumstances.

4.

Upon hearing, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to petitioner to make a Representation to third respondent within a

week from today, while relying upon Division Bench’s decision in Sumit Kumar (supra) and upon receipt of said Representation, third respondent

shall pass a speaking order thereon within a period of six weeks and it shall also indicate if there are any unfilled vacancies of Optical Workers and

disclose as to why petitioner’s Answer-sheet cannot be evaluated in view of decision in Sumit Kumar (supra) and the fate of the Representation

be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

5.

With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties.