High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 11 MAD CK 0033

R.Meena vs Commissioner Of Land Administration, Government Of Tamil Nadu Land Administration Department And Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 November 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 18589 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 328 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The present Writ Petition is filed in the nature of Mandamus seeking a direction against the first respondent/Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, to consider the assignment of lands in Survey No.17/1 an extent of 0.53.00 Hectares/1 Acre 32 Cents in Karenthelpatti Village, Thirukalapatti Panchayat, Mathavarayanpatti Group, Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District, in view of the Revenue Board Standing Order Rule RSO 21 and Revenue Policy 2001-2002, by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 13.09.2021.

2.Even though the relief sought has been worded with simple terms, the issue involved appears to be quite complicated. Originally, a Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.6571 of 2021 had been filed, wherein, the petitioner was shown as the sixth respondent and in that particular Writ Petition, which was allowed, a direction was given. The petitioner had been categorised as encroacher, and a direction was issued to remove the encroachment.

3.

The land in question is said to be Poramboke land. Pointing out this particular fact, Mr.A.Gandhiraj, learned Special Government Pleader insisted that unless all the litigations come to a finality, the first respondent can never be called upon to pass any order. It is also stated that an appeal is pending before the Collector.

4.In view of all these facts, a direction can be issued to the first respondent only when all litigations with respect to the nature of the land, nature of holding of the petitioner, status of the petitioner and the status of the Writ Petitioner in W . P . (MD)No . 6571 of 2021 are declared by an appropriate forum by a lawful order. Only then, the authority can be ordered to consider the application of the petitioner. Therefore, without entering into any further discussion on merits, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, after conclusion of all legal proceedings and judicial proceedings, the petitioner is given liberty to file fresh representation before the appropriate authority.

5.With the above observation, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.