High Courts(1935) 03 MAD CK 0052

RM. AR. AR. RM. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR and SON vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS.

Madras High Court · Decided on 20 March 1935 · Citation: (1935) 3 ITR 464

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 153 words

The only question argued here is question No. 1 referred by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax, that is, whether the sum of Rs. 3,250,

received by the petitioner was in respect of securities taxable u/s 8 of the Act or a receipt of his business to be brought into computation of the

income taxable u/s 10. The facts of this case are very clearly stated in the order of reference and the learned Income Tax Commissioner has very

clearly also stated his reasons for his opinion that this sum is to be treated as a receipt of a business income which falls to be brought into the

computation of the income taxable u/s 10. With those returns we fully agree and we accordingly answer the latter part of the question propounded

in the affirmative and direct the assessee to pay Rs. 250 costs of the Commissioner of Income Tax.

Reference answered accordingly.