High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 05 UK CK 0057

Rishipal And Others vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 9 May 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No.680 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 224 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. in Case Crime No.95 of 2019, under

Sections 147, 323, 324, 307, 354-A(1)(i), 354-B, 504 IPC, P.S. Raipur, District Dehradun and for stay of arrest.

2.

Heard and perused the records.

3.

According to the F.I.R on 15.04.2019 at 06:30 p.m. the petitioners abused, insulted and tried to assault the first informant. On the same day at about

07:30 p.m., the petitioners again armed with knives and lathi abused the first informant and assaulted him, his mother and his wife. The mother of the

first informant was molested; brother of the first informant was stabbed with knife and there are other details also in the F.I.R.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners simply urges that in case petitioners appear before the Court their bail application may be heard expeditiously.

5.

Perusal of FIR reveals commission of cognizable offence. In these proceedings scrutiny of the material cannot be meticulously done. Therefore,

this Court is of the view that there is no reason to quash the F.I.R and the petition deserves to be dismissed.

6.

The writ petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioners appear before the Court below, their bail application may be disposed of as expeditiously

as possible, in accordance with law.