High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 02 MAD CK 0108

Rickson vs Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.Dhandapani, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 2473 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 633 words

M.Dhandapani, J

1.

The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.02.2024 for the offences under Section 379 of IPC r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation), in Crime No.78 of 2024, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused persons were found in illegal possession of 2 ½ units of river sand using TATA 709 vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 45 K 4536, the vehicle along with sand was seized by the respondent Police. Hence, the present case has been registered.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any allegations as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 05.02.2024. However, on instructions, he would further submit that the petitioner, without prejudice to his rights, is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/-to the Government Higher Secondary School, Unjiyaviduthi Village, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District, for making toilet facility or renovation of toilet or providing facilities to the girls students. Hence, he prays for grant bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner was involved in illegal transportation of 2 ½ units of river sand and the vehicle involved in this case was seized by the respondent Police. He would fairly conceded that no previous case is pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently, opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the amount of sand involved in this case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, and on further conditions that:

(a) (i) after coming out on bail, as per the undertaking given by the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) by way of Demand Draft in favour of the Headmaster/Headmistress,GovernmentHigher Secondary School, Unjiyaviduthi Village, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District, for making toilet or renovation of toilet or providing facilities to the girls students within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

ii) the Headmaster/Headmistress of the above said school is directed to carry out the welfare works as mentioned above in their school using the above said deposit amounts and report the same with necessary proofs of accounts, receipts and documents before the concerned learned Judicial Magistrate and the Registrar, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, until further orders;

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.