High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 02 J&K CK 0001

Reshma Jan vs UT Of J&K & Ors

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 3 February 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajesh Sekhri, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 196 Of 2013, Civil Miscellaneous No. 318 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 207 words

Rajesh Sekhri, J

1.

The petitioner claims to be owner in possession of land under Khasra Nos.936 and 937 situate at Mouza Brari Nambal Naqashpora Babademb Road, Srinagar. Allegation of the petitioner is that respondents are trying to forcibly excavate and construct a drainage through her proprietary land without adopting due process of law. Such action of the respondents is stated to be arbitrary, unfair and unconstitutional because the petitioner is recorded lawful owner of the land in question. According to the petitioner, the respondents have neither notified nor declared that any part of the land in question is required for the public purpose.

2.

The petitioner seeks mandamus to the respondents to initiate acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring her land provided it is required for the public purpose as also a writ of prohibition restraining the respondents from taking forcible possession of the land in question without adopting due procedure of law.

3.

Given the nature of controversy involved, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents not to acquire the land of the petitioner under Khasra Nos.936 and 937 situate at Mouza Brari Nambal Naqashpora Babademb Road, Srinagar, without following due procedure of law.