High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 11 DEL CK 0299

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd vs Son Pal & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 21 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 700 Of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 337 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

The liability to pay compensation in the accident claim case (case no.833/2008) of the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants) has

been fastened by the tribunal, by its judgment dated 30.04.2012 against the appellant (insurer), it admittedly having issued the insurance policy covering

third party risk in respect of the offending vehicle described as a truck bearing registration no.UP-16-L-8742, the accident having occurred on

01.04.2007, resulting in death of Anil Kumar giving rise to the cause of action. The present appeal has been filed by the insurance company pressing it

for grant of recovery rights against the driver and owner of the offending vehicle.

2.

The insurance company had taken the defence of breach of terms and conditions of the insurance policy stating that the driver did not hold a valid

driving licence at the relevant point of time. It led evidence including verification report (Ex. R3W1/D) issued by Licencing Authority, Noida, which

was proved by the testimony of its witness (R3W1), Asst. Manager (Legal). This report indicates that the third respondent (driver) had a valid licence,

the validity of which had expired on 01.04.2006. Thereafter there was no renewal till the driver got it revalidated from 15.05.2007 onwards i.e. post

the accident.

3.

The issue is covered by decision of this court in MACA 203/2015, National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Jagmohan Juneja, decided on 22.08.2017.

The rule of main purpose as envisaged in National Insurance Company Ltd. V. Swaran Singh & Ors. (2004) 3 SCC 297, applies.

4.

The appeal is thus dismissed.

5.

By order dated 09.07.2012, the insurance company had been directed to deposit the entire awarded amount with up-to-date interest with UCO

Bank, Delhi High Court Branch and by subsequent order dated 19.12.2012, fifty percent (50%) was permitted to be released to the claimants. The

balance shall now be released to the claimants in terms of the impugned judgment.

6.

The statutory amount shall be refunded to the insurance company.

7.

The appeal is disposed of in above terms.