High CourtsSingle Bench(2002) 05 AHC CK 0037

Registrar of Companies vs Kamrao Plastique (P.) Ltd.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 21 May 2002 · Citation: (2002) 40 SCL 227

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Ambwani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Company Petition No. 64 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

29 paragraphs · 669 words
1.

Heard Sri Subodh Kumar, additional standing counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Pandey on behalf of Sri Ajai Prakash.

2.

This company petition has been filed by Registrar of Companies U.P. and Uttaranchal at Kanpur u/s 433(f) read with Section 439(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (''the Act'') to wind up the respondent-company after issuing statutory notice u/s 433(f) read with Section 439(6) and after getting sanction to file winding up petition u/s 439(6) vide order dated 14-9-2001 given by Regional Manager (NR), Camp Office New Delhi, Department of Company Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice and Company Affairs, Government of India in exercise of delegated power under the proviso to Sub-section (5) of Section 439.

3.

The petitioner has verified that during the investigation made by the Central Bureau of Investigation (''CBI''), in the matter of default in making payment to various investors by Century Consultant Ltd., a report was submitted by CBI dated 20-8-2001/23-8-2001 stating that the agency has registered criminal cases against Director of Century Consultant Ltd. having cheated several thousands of investors, and financial institutions through forgery, fraud and by corrupt/illegal business. Suits have been filed by the Bank and Financial Institutions before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. On the recommendation of the CBI for taking action u/s 26 of the Act, companies wherein Directors of Century Consultants/Cyberspace Scam or their employees are involved, the Central Government examined the matter and after giving statutory notice, sanction was given to the Registrar of the Companies to file this winding up petition.

4.

In para 4 of the petition the financial position of the company as on 31-3-2000 is disclosed as follows:

Liabilities

Shareholder Fund

22,000.00

Current Liabilities

500.00

Secured loans

Nil

Total

22,500.00

Assets

Fixed Assets

Nil

Cash in hand

8,193.00

Prel. Expenses

7,000.00

Incidental Expenditure

7,307.00

Total

22,500.00

5.

The company petition was directed to be advertised under rule 24 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and that the Official Liquidator was appointed provisional liquidator on 24-11-2001. The office reports that the summons sent have returned back with the report that there is no firm on the address. Copies of ''Hindustan Times'' (English) and ''Dainik Jagran'' (Hindi) in which notices have been published as well as, Official Gazette dated 9-3-2002 in which the notice has been published, have been filed on record.

6.

The Official Liquidator vide his report No. 170 of 2001 has reported that Sri Rajeev Kumar Nagia Ex-Director of the Company has handed over cash amounting to Rs. 652 along with copy of balance-sheet made as on 31-3-2001. The Ex-Director of the company has asked for formal notice for submission of statement of affairs.

7.

In the counter-affidavit of Sri Rajiv Kumar Nagia it has been stated that he is the Managing Director of the company and that he has no concern with the Century Consultant or its Directors. He states that the CBI has not registered any case against company and has not made adjudication against the company or Directors in their reports. He has no concern with the Directors of the Century Consultants Ltd. and its Directors Joharis and others. In regard to paragraph 15 he has admitted that he could not carry on any business after its incorporation since 11-7-1991 and that he has no objection to the winding up or dissolution of the company.

8.

From the aforesaid facts, the investigation made by the CBI and notices given by the Department of Company Affairs through Director (NR), the notices published to which no objection has been filed, and, upon hearing Sri Subodh Kumar for Registrar of Companies, U.P. & Uttaranchal, Kanur, the petitioner, I am satisfied that the respondent company is liable to be wound up u/s 433(b), (c) and (f).

9.

The company petition is, accordingly, allowed, and the respondent company is directed to be wound up. The official liquidator, who was appointed as Provisional Liquidator of the respondent-company vide order of this Court dated 24-11-2001, is appointed as the Liquidator of the company u/s 449.