Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 05 NCLT CK 2751

Regency Ispat Private Limited vs Vijay Citispace Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 5 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmi Gurung, Member (Judicial) · Hariharan Neelakanta Iyer, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
I.A. 2145 of 2023 in C.P.(IB)/3352 (MB)/C-III/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

502 paragraphs · 14,336 words

PER: SHRI. HARIHARAN NEELAKANTA IYER, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

I.A No. 2145/2023:

1.

This I.A. is filed by the Resolution Professional ('the Applicant') of Vijay Citispace Private Limited ('the Corporate Debtor') under Section 30(6) read with Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ('the Code') read with Regulation 39(4) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 ('CIRP Regulations'), seeking the following reliefs:

a)

The Resolution Plan along with the Addendum dated April 18, 2023 and clarification Email dated April 28, 2023 submitted by Shree Krishna Structure Private Limited and JP Infra Realty Private Limited be approved;

b)

Pass such other and further order as this Tribunal may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case.

Commencement of CIRP:

2.

The Corporate Debtor was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ('CIRP') vide order dated 20.07.2021 and the Applicant was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional ('IRP').

Public Announcement:

3.

The IRP made a public announcement under Regulation 6 of the IBBI (CIRP) Regulations, 2016 on 27.07.2021 to invite claims from the creditors of the Corporate Debtor in two newspapers namely, Financial Express and Navasakti. After receiving claims, the IRP prepared a list of Creditors, and constituted the Committee of Creditors ('CoC') on 12.08.2021 which consisted of JM Financial Credit Solutions Limited and Axis Bank Limited. Later, claims were received from other creditors and the CoC was reconstituted on 20.10.2023. The list of reconstituted CoC members are as follows:

Sr. No.Name of the CreditorAmount of claim received (Rs.)Amount of claim Admitted (Rs.)Voting %
1.JM Financial Asset Reconstruction58,59,22,95858,59,22,95857.38%
2.Asset Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Limited15,85,92,42210,11,79,5009.91%
3.82 Home Buyers29,94,98,95518,78,15,41518.39%
4.Axis Bank Limited4,66,59,5834,66,59,5834.57%
5.Pray Projects Private Limited12,29,76,0457,85,20,5487.69%
6.S.N. Damani Holdings Private Limited2,13,86,5942,07,10,6852.03%
7.Mr. Sanjay Ranade5,75,5413,39,1850.03%
Total1,23,56,12,0981,02,11,47,874100%

CoC Meetings

4.

The Applicant submits that a total of 29 Meetings of the CoC were held which are as follows:

Sr. No.Coc MeetingsDate of CoC Meetings
1.First Coc Meeting18.08.2021
2.Second CoC Meeting28.09.2021
3.Third CoC Meeting14.10.2021
4.Fourth CoC Meeting18.11.2021
5.Fifth CoC Meeting28.12.2021
6.Sixth CoC Meeting16.05.2022
7.Seventh CoC Meeting08.06.2022
8.Eighth CoC Meeting16.07.2022
9.Ninth CoC Meeting12.10.2022
10.Tenth CoC Meeting12.12.2022
11.Eleventh CoC Meeting30.12.2022
12.Twelfth CoC Meeting16.01.2023
13.Thirteenth CoC Meeting20.02.2023
14.Fourteenth CoC Meeting29.03.2023
15.Fifteenth CoC Meeting10.04.2023
16.Sixteenth CoC Meeting21.04.2023
17.Seventeenth CoC Meeting28.04.2023
18.Eighteenth CoC Meeting11.05.2023
19.Nineteenth CoC MeetingCalled off
20.Twentieth CoC Meeting07.05.2024
21.Twenty First CoC Meeting07.06.2024
22.Twenty Second CoC Meeting05.09.2024
23.Twenty Third CoC Meeting07.01.2025
24.Twenty Fourth CoC Meeting18.03.2025
25.Twenty Fifth CoC Meeting06.06.2025
26.Twenty Sixth CoC Meeting06.08.2025
27.Twenty Seventh CoC Meeting15.12.2025
28.Twenty Eighth CoC Meeting18.03.2026
29.Twenty-Nineth CoC Meeting23.04.2026

First CoC Meeting dated 18.08.2021:

5.

The First CoC meeting was held on 18.08.2021 wherein it was resolved to appoint the Applicant as the Resolution Professional ('RP').

Appointment of Registered Valuers:

6.

In the Second CoC meeting held on 28.09.2021, the Applicant appointed two registered valuers for each category of assets to determine the Fair Value and Liquidation Value of the assets of the Corporate Debtor in accordance with Regulation 35 of the CIRP Regulations. The average Fair value of the assets of the Corporate Debtor is Rs. 71,05,14,200/- and the Average Liquidation value of the assets of the Corporate Debtor is Rs.48,21,32,700/-. The valuation reports have been annexed as Annexure B to the Additional Affidavit dated 28.10.2025. The summary of valuation reports is as follows:

(In Rupees)

Sr. No.Asset CategoryFair value as per Valuer 1Fair value as per Valuer 2Liquidation Value as per Valuer 1Liquidation Value as per Valuer 2
1.Land and Building73,59,94,70068,49,02,50049,25,07,30047,16,53,100
2.Plant and Machinery66,20065,00053,00052,000
3.Total Value73,60,60,90068,49,67,50049,25,60,30047,17,05,100
Average Value71,05,14,20048,21,32,700

Invitation of Expression of Interest

7.

The Form G was published four times to invite EOI from PRAs. The details regarding publication of Form G is as follows:

Sr. No.Meeting in which CoC approved to publish FORM GDate of publication of FORM GLast date of submission of EOILast date of submission of Resolution Plan
1.Third CoC meeting20.10.202112.11.202123.12.2021
2.Fourth CoC Meeting24.11.202109.12.202107.02.2022
3.Sixth CoC Meeting21.05.202206.06.202214.07.2022
4.Seventh CoC meeting22.07.202206.08.202222.09.2022
8.

In the Third CoC Meeting held on 14.10.2021, the CoC approved publication of Form G and the eligibility criteria for Prospective Resolution Applicants ('PRAs'). Accordingly, Form G was published on 20.10.2021 in one English newspaper namely Financial Express and one Marathi Newspaper namely Navshakti wherein the last date for submission of the Expression of Interest ('EoI') was 12.11.2021. However, the Applicant received only one EoI as on 12.11.2021, therefore, in the fourth CoC Meeting held on 18.11.2021, the CoC decided to re-publish Form G. Accordingly, Form G was published on 24.11.2021 in one English newspaper namely Financial Express and one Marathi newspaper namely Navshakti wherein the last date for submission of resolution plans was 07.02.2022.

Fifth CoC Meeting dated 28.12.2021

9.

In the Fifth CoC Meeting held on 28.12.2021, the Applicant informed the CoC that 10 EoIs were received by the Applicant out of which six were shortlisted by the Applicant as Prospective Resolution Applicants (PRAs).

Sixth CoC Meeting dated 16.05.2021

10.

In the Sixth CoC Meeting held on 16.05.2022, the Applicant apprised the CoC of the extension of time provided to the PRAs to submit their Resolution Plans. However, despite the extension of time granted to the PRAs, the PRAs failed to submit any Resolution Plan, therefore the CoC decided to issue fresh Form G and the same was published on 21.05.2022, wherein the last date for submission of the resolution plans was fixed as 14.07.2022.

Seventh CoC Meeting dated 08.06.2022

11.

In the Seventh CoC Meeting held on 08.06.2022, the Applicant updated the CoC that Six EoIs were received out of which three were shortlisted as PRAs by the Applicant. However, no Resolution Plans were received.

12.

It is submitted that one of the eligibility criteria for PRAs was prior experience of three completed projects under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 ('RERA'). However, as RERA was brought into effect only in 2016 and the COVID-19 pandemic had adversely impacted real estate projects in the country, the eligibility criteria was acting as an impediment for participation in the CIRP and was also preventing financial institutions from participating as Resolution Applicants, therefore CoC decided to remove the said eligibility criteria and re-issue Form G- Invitation for EoI. Accordingly, the Applicant published fresh Form G for inviting EoI on 22.07.2022 one English newspaper namely Financial Express and one Marathi newspaper namely Navshakti, in response to which 11 EoIs were received.

Issuance of Provisional List, RFRP and Evaluation Matrix

13.

Thereafter, the Applicant issued the Provisional List of the PRAs on 16.08.2022 and the Final list of PRAs on 29.08.2022. The Applicant re-issued RFRP and Evaluation Matrix to PRAs on 23.08.2022. The last date of submission of Resolution Plan was also extended till 08.10.2022. Subsequently, the Applicant received Resolution Plans from four PRAs as on 08.10.2022.

Ninth CoC Meeting dated 12.10.2022

14.

In the ninth CoC Meeting held on 12.10.2022, the Applicant circulated the four Resolution Plans received from the PRAs. The CoC raised several questions regarding the Resolution Plans submitted by the PRAs and concluded that more time would be required to evaluate the resolution plans and seek adequate clarifications from the PRAs.

Tenth CoC Meeting dated 12.12.2022

15.

In the Tenth CoC Meeting held on 12.12.2022, the Applicant apprised the CoC that, resolution plans were discussed in the Ninth CoC Meeting. The observations made by the Applicant and CoC were sent to PRAs for further clarification and that the PRAs were yet to submit revised resolution plans. The Applicant also apprised the CoC that Resolution Plans were shared with the authorised representative of homebuyers, the authorised representative could not share the Resolution Plans with the homebuyers as homebuyers had failed to submit Non- Disclosure Agreement in relation to the resolution plans.

Eleventh CoC Meeting dated 30.12.2022

16.

In the Eleventh CoC Meeting held on 30.12.2022 the authorised representative of the homebuyers informed CoC and the Applicant that the homebuyers were ready to execute the Non-Disclosure Agreement. Accordingly, the Resolution Plans were shared with the homebuyers. In response to the queries raised by the CoC, two PRAs refrained from varying the terms of the Resolution Plan submitted by them, one PRA sought further time on account of holiday season in December 2022 and One PRA i.e. the SRA, submitted a revised Resolution Plan on 22.12.2022. One of the PRAs requested for further time for submitting the revised Resolution Plans, therefore time was extended until 11.01.2023.

Twelfth CoC Meeting

17.

In the Twelfth CoC Meeting held on 16.01.2023, the revised Resolution Plan submitted by the Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited and J.P. Infra Realty Private Limited was discussed. It was decided that the Applicant would evaluate all the available Resolution Plans and score them as per the Evaluation Matrix.

Receipt of new claim

18.

In January 2023, the Applicant received a claim from Asset Care and Reconstruction Enterprise Limited ('ACRE') for a financial debt of Rs. 15,85,92,422/-. After considering the said claim, the Applicant accepted the claim of ACRE for a financial debt of Rs.10,11,79,500/- as on 07.02.2023. Thus, ACRE was included in the CoC with 91% voting share, therefore there was a substantial change in the constitution of the CoC. Accordingly, the Applicant filed I.A. No. 675 of 2023 dated 14.02.2023 placing on record the reconstitution of the CoC. IA 675 of 2023 was allowed by an order dated 23.02.2023.

19.

Based on the reconstitution of the CoC, the PRAs were given additional time to revise the resolution plans to incorporate the additional claims admitted by the Applicant. Accordingly, in the Thirteenth CoC Meeting held on 20.02.2023, the PRAs were given additional time to submit the revised Resolution Plans.

Fourteenth CoC Meeting held on 30.03.2023

20.

Thereafter, the Applicant received requests form one of the PRAs for extension of time till 18.04.2023 to submit the revised Resolution Plan. The Applicant placed the said request before the fourteenth CoC Meeting held on 30.03.2023. The CoC granted time to resubmit the Resolution Plans.

21.

As on 18.04.2023, out of the four PRAs, only Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited and J.P. Infra Realty Private Limited submitted an addendum to its Resolution Plan. The said addendum to the Resolution Plan was discussed in the sixteenth CoC Meeting held on 21.04.2023.

Seventeenth CoC Meeting

22.

The Seventeenth CoC Meeting was held on 28.04.2023, in which the Resolution Plans submitted by the four PRAs were discussed. Upon various queries, the Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited and J.P. Infra Realty Private Limited addressed an email dated 28.04.2023 clarifying certain aspects of the Resolution Plan submitted. In the Seventeenth CoC Meeting, it was decided to put the said four Resolution Plans to vote. The time period for e-voting by home buyers was fixed from 30.04.2023 to 07.05.2023 and the time period for e-voting by other members of the CoC was fixed from 07.05.2023 to 10.05.2023.

Approval of the Resolution Plan

23.

The voting on the Resolution Plan was concluded on 10.05.2023 and the Eighteenth CoC Meeting was held on 11.05.2023 wherein the Resolution Plan submitted by consortium of Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited and J.P. Infra Realty Private Limited ('SRA') was approved by the CoC with 100% votes. The voting results are annexed as Annexure CC to the application.

Letter of Intent

24.

Pursuant to the approval of the Resolution Plan by the CoC, a Letter of Intent ('LOI') dated 13.05.2023 was issued in favour of the SRA.

Extension of CIRP Period

25.

It is submitted that extension of CIRP period was granted by this Tribunal from time to time and the Resolution Plan has been filed in 667 days after commencement of CIRP. The details of extension granted by this Tribunal are as follows:

Order DateExtension/ ExclusionPeriod
07.01.2022Extension (90 days)16.01.2022 to 16.04.2022
12.05.2023Exclusion (223 Days)16.04.2022 to 25.11.2022
12.05.2023Extension (227 Days)25.11.2022 to 10.07.2023

I.A.2145 of 2023

26.

It is pertinent to note that, the Applicant filed I.A. 2145 of 2023 for approval of the Resolution plan by this Tribunal. On an application filed by the suspended director, this Tribunal vide order dated 01.12.2023 rejected the Resolution Plan on the ground that SRA was not eligible under Section 29 A of the Code to submit the resolution plan. An Appeal was preferred against order dated 01.12.2023 before Hon'ble NCLAT. The Hon'ble NCLAT vide order dated 01.08.2025 set aside resolution plan rejection order and directed this Tribunal to hear plan application on merits. The relevant extracts of 01.08.2025 is reproduced as under:

34.

In light of the above submissions, we find there is no cogent or credible evidence to establish the disqualification of the Appellant under Section 29A of the Code. Furthermore, the Ld. Adjudicating Authority has failed to consider the Resolution Plan was duly approved by the CoC with 100% voting share. Therefore, we allow the present Appeal as we find the objections raised by Respondent No. 1 are devoid of merit. The impugned order is thus set aside and hence the Ld. NCLT may now proceed to hear CA No.2145/2023, qua approval of plan on merit.

27.

The Counsel for the suspended director during the course of hearing on 09.04.2026 submitted that he has filed a Civil Appeal No. 14501 of 2025 against order dated 01.08.2025 and upon query informed this Adjudicating Authority that there is no stay granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

28.

Accordingly, this Adjudicating Authority has proceeded to consider the present Interlocutory Application.

29. Salient features of the Resolution Plan submitted by SRA

29.1 Brief background of the Successful Resolution Applicant

The SRA is a consortium of Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited ('SKSPL') and J.P. Infra Realty Private Limited ('JPIRPL'). SKSPL is a private limited company registered at Chhattisgarh. It is involved in real estate activities with owned or leased properties. The business activities of SKSPL include buying, selling, renting and operating self-owned or leased real estate such as apartment building and dwellings, non-residential buildings, developing and subdividing real estate into lots etc, Also, SKSPL is also involved in the development and sale of land and cemetery plots, operation of apartment hotels and residential mobile home sites.

JPIRPL is a private limited company registered in Mumbai. It is involved in building of complete constructions or part thereof and civil engineering activities.

29.2 Performance Guarantee

The SRA has submitted performance Guarantee dated 16.05.2023 for an amount of Rs. 4,72,40,000/- valid uptil 16.11.2023. We note that the SRA has sent a reply to the LOI stating as follows:

“As per letter of Intent, we are required to furnish a proposal Performance Guarantee (PPG)/ Bank deposits of Rs. 4,72,40,000 for an initial period of 6 months that would be extendable until the successful implementation of the Resolution Plan.

The Performance Guarantee and reply to LOI is annexed as Annexure EE to the application.

29.3 Definitions

i) Effective Date

It was defined in the resolution plan that Effective Date shall refer to the date of approval by NCLT and final order passed by NCLAT and Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (if an appeal is preferred). Whereas in the Form H dated 27.10.2025 it was submitted that Effective date shall be the date of approval of Resolution Plan by Adjudicating Authority till the occurrence of Transfer Date. This Tribunal vide order dated 20.04.2026 sought clarification on the same. (The Applicant has separately clarified on the Effective date through an Additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026 which is noted below in para 37 of this order).

ii) Transfer Date

The Transfer date shall mean the date on which proposed transactions are completed, in accordance with the terms of RFRP and the Definitive Agreements and this Resolution Plan in accordance with the Applicable Laws. This Tribunal vide order dated 20.04.2026 sought clarification on the same. (The Applicant has separately clarified on the Effective date through an Additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026 which is noted below in para 37 of this order).

29.4 Treatment of Stakeholders as per Resolution Plan submitted by SRA

Treatment of Operational CreditorsThe total claim admitted of employees amounts to Rs. 2,33,31,776/-. Under the Resolution Plan, 1% of the said claim is to be paid to the employees which amounts to Rs. 2,00,000/-.
Treatment to Secured Financial CreditorsNameAdmitted claimAmount Payable under the PlanRemark
JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited58,59,22,95835,00,00,000Upfront payment Amount payable is 47% of the admitted claim amount.
ACRE10,11,79,500NilThe SRA has given up rights on the securities which are created in favour of ACRE.
Total68,71,02,45835,00,00,000
The total claim admitted of Secured Financial Creditors is Rs. 68,71,02,458. Under the Resolution Plan an amount of Rs. 35,00,00,000 is proposed to the paid to the Secured Financial Creditors.
Treatment of homebuyersThe homebuyers are given 3 options under the Resolution Plan which are as follows:

i. OPTION 1:

The SRA would complete the project and deliver the flats to the respective homebuyers as per the records under RERA. The SRA would deliver the flats at the rate of Rs. 13,365 per sq. ft. and any differential amount payable by the homebuyers will be payable within 30 days of demand for instalment. The SRA proposes to recover the balance amounts payable by the homebuyers in 3 instalments at the interval of 3 months each. It is further proposed that any delay in payment or non-acceptance of terms by the homebuyers will cancel their eligibility for delivery of the flat and the amount received from them will be treated as an unsecured loan.

ii. OPTION 2

The SRA proposes that if any of the homebuyers want to cancel their allotment then only to the extent of the admitted amount by the Applicant shall be repaid to such homebuyers either on resale of the said allotted property or at the end of three years whichever is earlier.

iii. OPTION 3

The SRA proposes that if any of the erstwhile homebuyers want to cancel their allotment, such homebuyers ought to intimate the same within a period of 15 days from the order of Hon'ble Tribunal approving the Resolution Plan. Upon such intimation, such homebuyers will be repaid only 70% of their admitted amount in the 4 tranches as follows

- a) 40% amount upfront - b) 30% at the end of 12 months - c) 15% at the end of 24 months. - d) 15% at the end of 36 months from the date of first payment.

Treatment of Unsecured Financial Creditors (other than homebuyers)The Total admitted claim of Unsecured Creditors is Rs. 14,62,30,001. Under the Resolution Plan unsecured financial creditors (other than homebuyers) are being allocated a total amount of Rs.6 crore i.e. 41% of the admitted claim. Such treatment is not in violation of the law since in case of liquidation as well, the unsecured financial creditors would receive NIL value.
Treatment of other creditors (other than financial and operational creditors)The total admitted claim is Rs. 1,57,79,82,984. Under the Resolution 1% of such claims i.e. Rs. 1,57,79,829/- is proposed to be paid to other creditors.
Treatment of Operational Creditors (other than workmen, employees and government dues)The total admitted claim of Operational Creditors (other than workmen, employees and government dues is Rs. 9,84,72,460. Under the Resolution Plan, 1% of such claims i.e. Rs. 10,00,000/- is being allocated towards payment of Operational Creditors (other than workmen, employees and government dues).
Treatment of Operational Creditors (Government Dues)Sr. NoName of AuthorityAmount claimedAmount AdmittedNature of claim
1.Talati, Kolhare Tehsil Office Karjat.6,60,6006,60,600NA Tax
2.Assistant Commissioner CGST & CX,2,63,33,7162,63,33,716GST
DIV-I, Bhiwandi.
3.Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, THA-VAT-E- 00340,69,43740,69,437Maharashtra VAT
4.Commissioner of State Tax THA-VAT-E- 0041,56,79,8341,56,79,834GST
Total4,67,43,5874,67,43,587
As against the above liabilities, the Resolution Plan proposes to pay 1% i.e. Rs. 4,67,435/- towards Government Dues.
Additional Investment by SRAApart from the payment of debt of the Corporate Debtor as aforesaid, the SRA proposes to make the following provisions for revival of the Corporate Debtor. a) Construction Cost - Rs. 222 Crores (to be invested over a period of time during the course of construction. b) Cost towards approvals - Rs. 42 Crores (over a period of 12 months to obtain various approvals) c) Other contingencies - Rs. 3.6 Crores (towards cost of de-registration and reregistration with RERA, disputed with societies, landlords etc.)

Additional Affidavit dated 20.06.2023

30.

This Tribunal had inquired whether there were any gratuity or provident fund dues payable to the employees of the Corporate Debtor and whether there was any order for payment of such dues. In response to the same the SRA filed additional Affidavit dated 20.06.2023 stating as follows:

...

8.

...

a. the Resolution Professional has not received any claim from the government department in respect of Gratuity or provident fund dues, accordingly, there is no admitted claim from any government authorities in respect of these dues.

b. 5 employees have claimed Gratuity in their claim form, the details of the same are hereunder.

Sl. NoName of EmployeeAmount ClaimedAmount Admitted
1.Mr. Sajeev MenonGratuity as per Act.1,90,385
2.Mr. Swapnil Rana66,00025,962
3.Mr. Kiran PatilGratuity as per applicable norms1,47,134
4.Mr. Santosh Trilotkar7,67,5103,25,385
5.Mr. Gokul Yeole10,81,2304,29,923
Total19,14,74011,18,788

c. only one employee, who had claimed Provident fund, the detail which is as under:

Sl. NoName of EmployeeAmount ClaimedAmount Admitted
1.Mr. Swapnil Rana46,80046,800
Total46,80046,800

d. As stated by the Resolution Professional, there are 36 employees who have submitted their claims in FORM D, the details of which are mentioned in the E-mail dated 19.06.2023 which is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure I. In the said Form D, the employees have not claimed any gratuity or Provident Fund.

9.

As per e-mail dated 19.06.2023 received by us from the Resolution Professional, whereby the Resolution Professional has stated that a total sum of Rs. 11.82 Lakhs is payable towards the gratuity and Provident Fund to employees of the Corporate Debtor.

10.

In view of the foregoing and in compliance of the latest Judgement of Jet Airways by the Hon'ble NCLAT, to avoid any further and future litigation to this effect, we hereby agree to pay the said sum of Rs. 11.82 lakhs in addition to the amount mentioned in the Resolution plan.

Additional Affidavit dated 28.10.2025

31.

This Tribunal on 15.10.2025 raised certain queries relating to valuation of properties secured in favor of ACRE, the options given to homebuyer, payment of CIRP Cost and filing of revised form H and had directed the Applicant to file Additional Affidavit. In response the Applicant has filed an additional Affidavit dated 28.10.2025 and has, inter-alia, made the following submission:

4.

Under the Resolution Plan, the SRA has given up its right on certain assets of the Corporate Debtor which are secured in favour of Asset Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Limited (ACRE). Thus, ACRE would be entitled to enforce the security interest in respect of the said assets. The assets secured in favour of ACRE are all situated in the Project named “Vijay Galaxy” and the details thereof are set forth below.

(i)

Shop no.1 (1309 sq. ft carpet area) and

(ii)

Shop no.9 (318 sq. ft carpet area) on ground floor

(iii)

Office no.1(2727 sq. ft carpet area) and

(iv)

Office no 2 (1748 sq. ft carpet area) on first floor

5.

This Tribunal had enquired about the valuation of the aforesaid properties secured in favour of ACRE. As per the valuation reports obtained by me, the valuation of the said properties is approx. Rs. 8,16,00,000 (Rupees Eight Crores and Sixteen Lakhs only). However, the properties have been sold to certain purchasers without the consent of ACRE (and the predecessor in title of ACRE) Prior to the CIRP. Thus, Interlocutory Application No. 1152 of 2023 has been filed to seek handover of the said properties to the Resolution Professional. The said Interlocutory Application is currently pending hearing and disposal before this Hon’ble Tribunal. Since the said properties were sold prior to the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor, the value of the said properties is considered as NIL whilst computing the liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor.

6.

Further, as per the Resolution Plan, the homebuyers are given 3 options under the Resolution Plan. Under the 1% option, the SRA would complete the project and deliver the flats to the respective homebuyers as per the records under RERA. The SRA would deliver the flats at the rate of Rs. 13,365 per sq. ft. and any differential amount payable by the homebuyers will be payable within 30 days of demand for instalment. Notably, this Hon'ble Tribunal had enquired about the difference in the rate per square feet originally agreed by the homebuyers and the rate per square feet being charged by the SRA for the flats. In this regard, I could verify the rate per square foot agreed by the homebuyers in respect of 58 homebuyers from their respective agreements / Index II executed with the Corporate Debtor. Thus, the per square feet rate varies from Rs. 11,227 per square foot to Rs. 15,724 per square foot with average rate of Rs.13,515 per square foot. As against the said average amount, the SRA has proposed to deliver flats at the rate of Rs. 13, 365 per sq. ft.

7.

Further, under the 2nd Option for homebuyers, the Resolution Plan proposes that if any of the homebuyers want to cancel their allotment then the amount (only to the extent admitted by the RP) shall be repaid to such homebuyers either on resale of the said allotted property or at the end of three years whichever is earlier. Notably, the net present value of the amount payable to the homebuyer under the 2nd Option is Rs. 15,33,13,325 (Rupees Fifteen Crores Thirty-Three Lakhs Thirteen Lakhs Three Hundred and Twenty-Five only).

8.

The Resolution Plan also provides the homebuyer with the 3rd Option, whereunder the Resolution Plan proposes that if any of the erstwhile homebuyers want to cancel their allotment and wish to receive upfront payment, such homebuyers ought to intimate the same within a period of 15 days from the order of this Hon'ble Tribunal approving the Resolution Plan. Upon such intimation, such homebuyers will be repaid only 70% of their admitted amount in the 4 tranches as follows — (i) 40% amount upfront; (ii) 30% at the end of 12 months; (iii) 15% at the end of 24 months; and (iv) 15% at the end of 36 months from the date of first payment. Notably, the NPV of the amounts payable to homebuyers as per the 3rd Option is Rs. 12,27,71,937 (Rupees Twelve Crores Twenty-Seven Lakhs Seventy-One Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty-Seven only).

9.

The Resolution Plan proposed to pay 100% of the CIRP Cost in priority over other payments. I say that the Addendum to the Resolution Plan dated April 18, 2023 (forming part of the Resolution Plan) categorically provides for payment of the CIRP cost in actuals, even when the same exceeds the estimated CIRP cost mentioned in the Resolution Plan.

32.

Additional Affidavit dated 30.10.2025 This Tribunal during the course of hearing on 29.10.2025 raised a query in respect of claim of ACRE that in case ACRE recovers amounts from the secured assets in excess of its admitted claim, what will be the treatment of such excess recovery. Pursuant thereto, ACRE has filed an additional Affidavit dated 30.10.2025 and has, inter-alia, submitted as follows:

3.

I say that the total admitted claim of ACRE in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor is Rs. 10,11,79,500 (Rupees Ten Crores, Eleven Lacs, Seventy-Nine Thousand and Five Hundred only). Under the Resolution Plan, the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) has agreed to forego the rights and claims on the securities created in favour of ACRE in respect of the debt owed by the Corporate Debtor to ACRE. Thus, ACRE is entitled to recover its debt from such secured assets. Notably, the said secured assets had been sold by the Corporate Debtor prior to commencement of the CIRP without the consent of ACRE. The assets secured in favour of ACRE are all situated in the Project named “Vijay Galaxy” and the details thereof are set forth below.

1.

Shop no.1(1309 sq. ft carpet area)

2.

Shop no.9 (318 sq. ft carpet area) on ground floor

3.

Office no.1 (2727 sq. ft carpet area)

4.

Office no 2 (1748 sq. ft carpet area) on first floor

4.

Further, as per the valuation report obtained by the RP, the fair market value of the aforesaid secured assets of ACRE is Rs. 16,33,00,000 (Rupees Sixteen Crores and thirty-three Lakhs only) and the liquidation value of the said assets is approx. Rs. 8,16,00,000 (Rupees Eight Crores and Sixteen Lakhs only).

5.

In view of the above, the fair market value of the secured assets is higher than the admitted claim of ACRE...

6.

... I say that in case ACRE recovers amounts in excess of its admitted claim from the secured assets, ACRE is ready and willing to pay such excess amount to the Corporate Debtor after satisfaction of the entire debt of ACRE owed by the Corporate Debtor. Thus, ACRE would not be appropriating amounts in excess of its admitted claim against the Corporate Debtor.

Additional Affidavit dated 28.03.2026

33.

This Tribunal on 23.02.2023 sought various following clarifications from the Applicant:

i.

According to Form-H, total of 26 CoC meetings were held but the dates of these meetings are not mentioned.

ii.

Clarification regarding 100% CIRP cost by the SRA;

iii.

Clarify if there are any government dues which are covered as secured debt as per the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State Tax Officer (1) vs. Rainbow Papers Limited in Civil Appeal No. 1661 OF 2020;

iv.

Clarification that the plan is unconditional and Resolution Plan shall be binding on Successful Resolution Applicant, as per judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ebix Singapore Private Limited vs. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited & Anr. in Civil Appeal No. 3224 of 2020;

v.

Copy of Second and Fourth Form-G with names of the newspapers in which they were published;

vi.

Undertaking that the performance security deposited with the Bank under lien in favour of "Victory Real Estate 2021 Trust" shall be renewed from time to time till full implementation of the Plan;

vii.

Clarification on the liability of the consortium partners;

34.

Pursuant thereto the Applicant submitted an additional affidavit dated 28.03.2026 submitting as follows:

Clarification 1: To place on record all the minutes of the meetings of the Committee of Creditors.

4.

During the course of the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of the Corporate Debtor, 18 meetings of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) were held upto the stage of approval of the resolution plan.

5.

Thereafter, the suspended promoter of the Corporate Debtor filed Interlocutory Application No. 2593 of 2023 (Objection IA) raising several objections to the resolution plan submitted by the SRA. By an Order dated December 1, 2023, this Tribunal allowed the Objection IA and rejected the Plan Application on the ground that the SRA was not eligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to submit a resolution plan. In these circumstances the SRA filed Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 35 of 2024 (Appeal) before the Hon'ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT) challenging the order dated December 1, 2023. By an Order dated August 1, 2026, the Hon'ble NCLAT allowed the appeal and directed this Hon'ble Tribunal to hear the Plan Application on merits.

6.

During the pendency of the Appeal and till date, additional 10 meetings of the CoC were held. The following meetings of the CoC were held from May 19, 2023 (date of e-filing of the Plan Application) till date;

Sr. NoParticularsDate of CoC Meeting
1.Nineteenth CoC MeetingCalled off
2.Twenty CoC Meeting07.05.2024
3.Twenty First CoC Meeting07.06.2024
4.Twenty Second CoC Meeting05.09.2024
5.Twenty Third CoC Meeting07.01.2025
6.Twenty Fourth CoC Meeting18.03.2025
7.Twenty Fifth CoC Meeting06.06.2025
8.Twenty Sixth CoC Meeting06.08.2025
9.Twenty Seventh CoC Meeting15.12.2025
10.Twenty Eighth CoC Meeting18.03.2026
7.

It is pertinent to note that the 19th meeting of the CoC was initially scheduled on January 8, 2024; however, the same was postponed twice. The second postponement was due to non-availability of quorum. Thus, the Resolution Professional decided to call off the 19th meeting and convene the 20th meeting of the CoC on May 7, 2024.

Clarification 2: whether the 100% of the CIRP costs would be paid by the SRA

8.

With regards to the CIRP Costs, I say that the Resolution Plan proposed to pay 100% of the CIRP Cost in priority over other payments. I say that the Addendum to the Resolution Plan dated April 18, 2023 (forming part of the Resolution Plan) categorically provides for payment of the CIRP cost in actuals, even when the same exceeds the estimated CIRP cost mentioned in the Resolution Plan [See Addendum for the Resolution Plan dated April 18, 2023 at Pg. 133 (relevant Pg. 135) of the Plan. Application. Pertinently, the total estimated CIRP costs as on March 19, 2026 is Rs. 3,08,46,753 (Rupees Three Crores Eight Lakhs Forty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty-Three only.

9.

Further, the SRA vide an email dated March 26, 2026 has undertaken that the SRA would pay the entire outstanding CIRP costs over and above the other amounts payable under the Resolution Plan.

Clarification 3: To clarify whether any of the Government dues are payable in priority as per the Judgement in Rainbow Papers.

10.

This Hon’ble Tribunal at the hearing held on February 23, 2026 had noted that though the Resolution Plan provided that the government dues payable in view of the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in State Tax Officer (1) v Rainbow Papers Limited [2022 SCC Online SC 1162] (Rainbow Papers) would be paid in priority, the Resolution Plan does not quantify such government dues. Thus, the Resolution Professional was directed to clarify whether any government dues were pending, which would be accorded priority as per the judgement of Rainbow Papers. I say that no government dues, which are verified and admitted by me, are required to be paid in priority as per the Rainbow Papers.

Clarification 4: Whether the Resolution Plan is unconditional and the Resolution Plan shall be binding on the SRA as per the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited and Anr. in Civil Appeal No. 3224 of 2020

11.

I say that the Resolution Plan would be governed by the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited and Anr. in Civil Appeal No. 3224 of 2020. Notably, the SRA has also confirmed by the email dated March 26, 2026 that the Resolution Plan is unconditional and binding upon them.

Clarification 5: To place on record all (4 in number) Form G published during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor.

12.

During the pendency of the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor, the Resolution Professional had issued four Form G- Invitation for Expression of Interest (Form G - EoI). I say that the 1st Form G - EoI was issued on October 20, 2021 and was published in two local newspapers i.e. Financial Express (English) and Navshakti (Marathi) on October 20, 2021. The 2nd Form G - EoI was issued on November 24, 2021 and was published in two local newspapers i.e. The Free Press Journal (English) and Navshakti (Marathi) on November 24, 2021. The 3rd Form G - EoI was issued on May 21, 2022 and was published in two local newspapers i.e. The Free Press Journal (English) and Navshakti (Marathi) on May 21, 2022. The 4th Form G - EoI was issued on July 22, 2022 and was published in two local newspapers i.e. The Free Press Journal (English) and Navshakti (Marathi) on July 22, 2022.

Clarification 6: Whether the performance security furnished by the SRA has been renewed from time to time

13.

I say that the SRA had furnished a Fixed Deposit Receipt as a performance security under the resolution plan. I say that a copy of the said Fixed Deposit Receipt bearing account no. 7505728456 has been produced at Annexure EE to the Plan Application (see page no. 320 of the Plan Application). I say that the said Fixed Deposit has been renewed from time to time and is duly maintained by the SRA. I say that the latest renewal of the said Fixed Deposit is dated November 16, 2025 for a period of 6 months. It is pertinent to note that the said Fixed Deposit is on an auto renewal basis. I say that a copy of the renewal advice issued by the concerned bank in respect of the said fixed deposit is hereto annexed as Annexure F

14.

Further, by the email dated March 26, 2026, the SRA has confirmed that the said fixed deposit receipt will continue to be held until implementation of the Resolution Plan.

Clarification 7: Clarifications regarding the liability of the members of the SRA under the Resolution Plan

15.

I say that the Request for Resolution Plan dated August 23, 2022 (RFRP) issued during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor provides that in case of the resolution applicant is a consortium – “(v) All the members of the consortium shall be jointly and severally liable in respect of obligations under the Process Document, the Resolution Plan and for the implementation of the Approved Resolution Plan.”

16.

In view of the foregoing, by an email dated March 26, 2026, the SRA has confirmed that both the members of the SRA i.e. Shree Krishna Structure Private Limited and J P Infra Realty Private Limited shall be jointly and severally liable in respect of the Resolution Plan. The SRA has further stated that Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited has undertaken to bear the primary responsibility and liability with respect to the implementation and making the required payments under the Resolution Plan as well as the other compliances under law.

35.

This Tribunal upon perusing the Additional Affidavit dated 28.03.2026, raised a query with respect to the Fixed Deposit Receipt furnished by the SRA as a performance security under the Resolution Plan in favour of Victory Real Estate 2021 Trust. The Applicant in response has filed Additional affidavit dated 07.04.2026 which is reproduced as under:

5.

I say that Clause 1.10.1 of the Request for Resolution Plan dated August 23, 2022 (RFRP) provides that upon approval of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors, the SRA shall provide an unconditional and irrevocable Performance bank Guarantee in favour of lead lender. The relevant clause of RFRP is set as follows:

“1.10.1

On the approval of Resolution Plan by COC, LOI will be issued by the Resolution Professional on behalf of COC to the Successful Resolution Applicant. Within 3 working days of issuance of LOI, the Successful Resolution Applicant shall, provide an unconditional and irrevocable performance bank guarantee / Bank deposit of amount equivalent to 10% of Resolution Plan Value PBG in the form of a bank guarantee/demand draft/fixed deposit in favour of “Lead Lender” (Details of Lead Lender Bank name, account no., IFSC Code, will be sent in due course), at time of submission of Performance Bank Guarantee. The Performance Guarantee should be payable at Mumbai and should be executed from Scheduled Bank located in India, other than Cooperative banks. The form of the Performance Guarantee shall be in the form provided in Format VIII. The PPG has to be strictly issued in the format attached and no request for change in the format of PPG will be entertained by the RP/CoC. The PBG shall be valid for an initial period of 6 (six) months from the date of approval of Resolution Plan by COC and shall be extended/renewed by the Successful Resolution Applicant for such period until the successful implementation of the Resolution Plan i.e. until all dues payable by the Successful Resolution Applicant in relation to the Resolution Plan have been fully paid and its claim satisfied or discharged for the satisfaction of CoC. In case of bank deposit, the amount so deposited shall be lien marked until the successful implementation of the Resolution Plan.”

6.

Accordingly, the Resolution Professional obtained the requisite bank account details from the lead lender i.e. JMFARC (trustee of Victory Real Estate 2021 Trust) and provided the same to the SRA under the Letter of Intent dated May 13, 2023. A copy of the Letter of Intent dated May 13, 2023 issued in favour of the SRA is annexed to the above Application as Annexure DD.

7.

In view of the above, the SRA had furnished a Fixed Deposit Receipt of Rs. 2,72,40,000 (Rupees Two Crores Seventy-Two Lakhs and Forty Thousand only) as a performance security under the resolution plan which is pledged in favour of Victory Real Estate 2021 Trust. I say that a copy of the said Fixed Deposit Receipt bearing account no. 7505728456 has been produced at Annexure EE to the Plan Application. I say that the said Fixed Deposit has been renewed from time to time and is duly maintained by the SRA. I say that the latest renewal of the said Fixed Deposit is dated November 16, 2025 for a period of 6 months (see page no. 104 of the Additional Affidavit dated March 28, 2026). In addition to the said amount of Rs. 2,72,40,000 (Rupees Two Crores Seventy-Two Lakhs and Forty Thousand only), the SRA had also deposited an amount of Rs. 2,00,00,000 (Rupees Two Crores only) towards earnest money deposit as a pre-condition for participating as a prospective resolution applicant in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. The said amount also remains deposited towards the performance guarantee as has been confirmed by the lead lender by an email dated April 6, 2025, a copy of which is hereto annexed as Annexure B. Additionally, the SRA had also addressed letter dated May 16, 2023 providing the details of the performance guarantee for implementation of the Resolution Plan, which is annexed to the above Application as Annexure EE (see page no. 321 of the application).

Additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026

36.

This Tribunal on 20.04.2026 sought various following clarifications from the Applicant which are as follows:

i.

As per Para 9 of Form H Constitution of new Board is E (NCLT Approval date/ Effective Date) + 30 Days and payment of CIRP Cost is E+ 60 Days. How can new Board be constituted before payment of CIRP Cost? Clarify.

ii.

Whether Authorised Representative of homebuyers will be part of Monitoring Committee? Clarify.

iii.

Clarification in regards to Effective date and Transfer Date.

iv.

In the additional Affidavit dated 4.11.2025 it was submitted that if ACRE recovers amount in excess of its admitted claim from the secured assets, ACRE shall pay such excess amount to the Corporate Debtor after satisfaction of the entire debt of ACRE owed by the Corporate Debtor. SRA to give undertaking that once the excess amount is received the same shall be paid to the Financial Creditors in their claim proportion.

37.

Pursuant thereto the Applicant filed an Additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026 wherein it was clarified that the Twenty Ninth CoC meeting was held on 23.04.2026 wherein clarifications sought by this Tribunal were discussed and deliberated upon followed by e-voting. The Applicant has also enclosed the minutes of the Twenty Ninth CoC meeting and also an email dated 24.04.2026 sent from the SRA to RP. The relevant paragraphs of Additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026 are as under:

QUERY 1 —Upfront payment stipulated under the Resolution Plan ought to be made prior to or simultaneously with the handover of control and management of the Corporate Debtor to the SRA.

11.

In view of the above clarification sought by this Hon'ble Tribunal, the SRA has clarified that the upfront payment under the Resolution Plan including the CIRP costs shall be paid within E+45 days i.e. within 45 days from the approval of the Resolution Plan by this Hon'ble Tribunal and the control and management of the Corporate Debtor shall also be handed over to the SRA within E+45 days simultaneously with payment of the upfront amounts. This clarification by the SRA is recorded in the email dated April 24, 2026 addressed by the SRA. The relevant extract of the said email is set out below (see pg. 78 of the present Affidavit)- (Annexure D)

“SRA Response: We clarify as follows:

1.

We shall pay the entire resolution plan amount within E + 45 as provided in Exhibit 3.8 of the Resolution plan.

2.

Simultaneously with payment of the plan amounts within the aforesaid timeline of E+45, the board shall be reconstituted and we shall take over the company.

As has already been stated in Clause 3.8.1 of the resolution plan, the provisions relating to home buyers shall continue as per the terms of the resolution plan and addendums and the aforesaid payment of amounts to all the creditors within E+45 days does not include any provisions related to home buyers.”

12.

The aforesaid clarification from the SRA was duly recorded in the minutes of the 29th meeting of the CoC (see pg. 15 of the present Affidavit). Moreover, the CoC has also approved the SRA’s commitment to pay the CIRP costs within E+45 days and simultaneously, reconstitution of the Board of Directors of the Corporate Debtor with 99.96% of the total voting share of the CoC (see pg. 51 of the present Affidavit).

13.

In addition to the aforesaid, it must be noted that the Resolution Plan provides that from the date of the approval of the Resolution Plan until the Transfer Date (the date of upfront payment to the creditors, except homebuyers, is completed), the affairs of the Corporate Debtor are to be managed by the Implementation and Monitoring Committee (See Cl. 3.8.2 at Pg. 96 of the Plan Application).

QUERY 2 —Clarifications regarding the definition of “Effective date”

14.

This Hon’ble Tribunal sought a clarification on the definition of Effective Date under the Resolution Plan. In this regard, the SRA provided the following clarification, which is duly recorded in the email dated April 24, 2026. The relevant extract of the said email is set out below (see pg. 78 of the present Affidavit)-

“SRA Response: As already stated previously, the Resolution Applicants reiterate and affirm that the Resolution Plan is unconditional and binding on them. We reiterate once again that effective date shall be the date of approval of the resolution plan by NCLT”.

15.

The aforesaid clarification from the SRA was duly recorded in the minutes of the 29th meeting of the CoC (see pgs. 15-16 of the present Affidavit) and approved by the CoC with 99.96% of the total voting share of the CoC (see pg. 52 of the present Affidavit).

QUERY 3 —Clarifications regarding the definition of “Transfer date”

16.

This Hon’ble Tribunal sought a clarification on the definition of Transfer Date and its relevance under the Resolution Plan. In this regard, the SRA provided the following clarification, which is duly recorded in the email dated April 24, 2026. The relevant extract of the said email is set out below (see pg. 78 of the present Affidavit)-

“SRA Response: We undertake that we shall pay the entire resolution plan amounts payable to all creditors (except homebuyers) within 45 days of the NCLT Approval Date. Currently, the plan contemplates that Transfer Date shall mean the date on which proposed transactions are completed in accordance with the terms of the RFRP and the Definitive Agreements and this Resolution Plan in accordance with the Applicable Laws. As there are no definitive agreements contemplated by the RA at this stage, accordingly, Transfer Date shall mean the date on which the entire resolution plan amounts are paid to the all creditors (other than homebuyers). On and from the Transfer Date, as per Clause 3.8.2 of the Resolution Plan, the Resolution Applicants shall reconstitute the board of the Corporate Debtor.

As has already been stated in Clause 3.8.1 of the resolution plan, it is clarified that the provisions relating to home buyers shall continue as per the terms of the resolution plan and addendums and the aforesaid payment of amounts to the creditors within E+45 days does not include any provisions related to home buyers.”

17.

The aforesaid clarification from the SRA was duly recorded in the minutes of the 29th meeting of the CoC (see pg. 16 of the present Affidavit) and approved by the CoC with 99.96% of the total voting share of the CoC (see pg. 53 of the present Affidavit).

18.

In addition to the aforesaid clarification provided by the SRA, I say that as per the Resolution Plan, the Transfer Date is the date on which the Upfront Cash is paid by the SRA to the creditors as stipulated under the Resolution Plan. I say that the Resolution Plan contemplates a phased transition of control and management of the Corporate Debtor to the SRA. I say that from the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by this Hon'ble Tribunal (i.e. Effective Date) till the occurrence of the Transfer Date, the Corporate Debtor shall be managed by the Implementation and Monitoring Committee, as specifically provided in the Resolution Plan (see Exhibit 3.8.2 @ Pg. 96 of the Plan Application). I say that upon the occurrence of the Transfer Date (i.e. the date of upfront payments to the creditors of the Corporate Debtor), the control and management of the Corporate Debtor shall stand transferred to the SRA.

Query 4- Clarification regarding the interest of homebuyers being represented in the Monitoring Committee.

20.

In view of the concerns raised by this Hon'ble Tribunal, it has been agreed between the CoC as well as the SRA that a representative of the homebuyers shall be a part of the MC as an observer. It is further agreed that such representative of the homebuyers shall not have any voting rights in the MC. This arrangement shall ensure that homebuyers have access to all information pertaining to the implementation of the Resolution Plan and at the same time this change in the MC shall not affect the voting share of the parties in the MC as stipulated under the Resolution Plan.

21.

The aforesaid requirement of inducting a representative of the homebuyer in the MC in observational capacity has been duly agreed by the SRA in its email dated April 24, 2026 (see pg. 78 of this Affidavit). Further, the CoC has approved the aforesaid requirement of inducting a representative of the homebuyer in the MC in observational capacity with 90.26% of the total voting share of the CoC (see pg. 55 of the present Affidavit). It must be noted that the homebuyers have also accepted this proposal and voted in favour of the same in the 29th meeting of the CoC. Notably, one Mr. Vinayak Harnekar has been appointed as the representative of the homebuyers, who would attend the MC on behalf of the homebuyers.

QUERY 5 — Clarifications regarding the treatment of excess amounts, if any, recovered by Asset Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Limited from the secured assets.

23.

In view of the clarifications sought by this Hon'ble Tribunal, the issue regarding refund of excess amounts, if any, recovered by ACRE to the Corporate Debtor was discussed and voted upon in the CoC. Accordingly, the CoC has agreed that any excess amounts, if any, recovered by ACRE shall be refunded to the Corporate Debtor (see pg. 56 of the present Affidavit).

24.

In addition to the above, the SRA has also clarified that the refund of excess monies to the Corporate Debtor is in consonance with clause 4.1.33 of the Resolution Plan which provides as under —

“If any person, who is, being paid monies under the Resolution Plan, recovers any additional amount, other than what has been stipulated to them under this Resolution Plan, through/by the Corporate Debtor, then such person shall pay the additional amounts so recovered, to the Corporate Debtor with respect of the claims which stand extinguished in the Resolution Plan.

25.

In view of the above, I say that the refund of excess amounts, if any, recovered by ACRE from sale of its secured assets to the Corporate Debtor is not only in consonance with the provisions of the Resolution Plan, but also duly approved by the CoC.

Compliance Certificate in Form – H

38.

The Applicant has filed Additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026 placing on record revised form H dated 27.04.2026. Some of the important clauses of Form H are set in below:

1. The details of CIRP are as under:

Sr.ParticularsDescription
1.Name of the CDVijay Citispace Private Limited
2.Date of Initiation of CIRP20th July 2021 (Intimated to IRP on July 23, 2021)
3.Date of Appointment of IRP20th July, 2021
4.Date of Publication of Public Announcement27th July 2021
5.Date of Constitution of CoC12th August, 2021
6.Date of First Meeting of CoC18th August 2021
7.Date of Appointment of RP21st August 2021
8.Date of Appointment of Registered Valuers17th September, 2021
9.Date of Issue of Invitation for EoI (In case of multiple issuance of EoI, please specify all such dates)20th October, 2021 24th November, 2021 21st May, 2022 22nd July, 2022
10.Date of Final List of Eligible Prospective Resolution Applicants29th August, 2022
11.Date of Invitation of Resolution Plan23rd August, 2022
12.Last Date of Submission of Resolution Plan8th October, 2022
13.Date of submission of Resolution Plan to the RP8th October, 2022
14.Date of placing the Resolution Plan before the CoC12th October, 2022 (Revised Resolution plan put for e-voting at 17th CoC Meeting held on 28.04.2023)
15.Date of Approval of Resolution Plan by CoC11th May, 2023
16.Date of Filing of Resolution Plan with Adjudicating Authority19th May, 2023
17.Date of Expiry of 180 days of CIRP16th January, 2022
18.Date of each order extending the period of CIRP on request filed by RPOrder DateExtension/ExclusionPeriod
07.01.2022Extension (90 days)16-01-2022 to 16-04-2022
12.05.2023Exclusion (223 Days)16-04-2022 to 25- 11-2022
12.05.2023Extension (227 Days)25-11-2022 to 10- 07-2023
19.Date of Expiry of Extended Period of CIRP10th July,2023
20.Fair Value71,05,14,200
21.Liquidation Value48,21,32,700
22.Number of Meetings of CoC held29

1B i) Whether Application for approval of Resolution Plan filed within 180 days of CIRP initiation: No.

(ii)

Number of days beyond 180 days taken for filing application for resolution plan: 487 days.

(iii)

Reasons for delay: Multiple issuances of Form-G and deliberation on the Resolution Plan by Committee of Creditors for value maximisation of the CD.

2.

I hereby certify that-

(i)

the said Resolution Plan complies with all the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC / Code), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP Regulations) and does not contravene any of the provisions of the law for the time being in force.

(ii)

the Resolution Applicant M/s. Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited and J.P. Infra Reality Private Limited has submitted an affidavit pursuant to Section 30(1) of the Code confirming its eligibility under Section 29A of the Code to submit resolution plan. The contents of the said affidavit are in order.

(iii)

the said Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC in accordance with the provisions of the Code and the CIRP Regulations made thereunder. The Resolution Plan has been approved by 100% of voting share of financial creditors after considering its feasibility and viability and other requirements specified by the CIRP Regulations.

(iv)

I sought vote of members of the CoC by Electronic Voting System which was kept open for at least 24 hours as per regulation 26.

3.

The details and documents related to the successful resolution applicant are as under:

Sr.ParticularsDescription
1.Name of Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA)M/s. Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited and J. P. Infra Reality Private Limited.
2.Nature of Business of SRAM/s. Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited is involved in Real Estate activities with own or leased properties. M/s J.P. Infra Reality Private Limited is involved in Real Estate activities focusing majorly on residential and affordable housing.
3.Relationship status of SRA with CD, if anyNo relation between SRA with CD
4.Whether SRA is eligible to submit plan under 240 A of IBC in case of MSME CDNot Applicable
5.Due Diligence Certificate of the RP u/s 29 A of IBC for the SRAAnnexure-1
4.

The details of CIRP, and resolution plan are as under:

SlParticularsDescription
1.Whether Corporate Debtor is an MSME, if so, Date of obtaining MSME registration (pls attach copy of registration certificate)No MSME Certificate was provided to the Resolution Professional.
2.Business of the CDCD is engaged mainly in the business of Builders and Real Estate Developers.
3.Total admitted claimsSlDescriptionPrincipalInterest and penaltyTotal
1.Corporate Guarantee claims000
2.Other than Corporate Guarantee claims241,19,95,17835,73,20,952276,93,16,130
4.Resolution Plan Value (includingResolution Plan Value is Rs. 327,99,57,570/-
insolvency resolution process cost, infusion of funds, etc.) (In the case of real estate CDs, provide the monetary value of flats etc. given to allottees)This includes, additional CIRP Cost of Rs.1,42,44,245 upto 06.08.2025 over the cost proposed in addendum to resolution plan (actual CIRP cost is payable as per clause 60 as amended by addendum dated 22-12-22 of resolution plan) and Monetary Value of flats given to Allottees Rs. 15,33,13,325 calculated by deriving net present value of the amount offered in Resolution Plan under Option 2 to Allottees. Further it includes SRA's proposal towards Construction Cost for Rs. 222 Crores over a period of time for completion of construction, Rs.42 Crores for various approvals and Rs.3.60 crores for other contingencies. Thus, the amount payable to creditors and CIRP cost is Rs.60,39,57,570 as detailed in table of point 7A below. Total Plan Value is derived as follows:
ParticularsAmount (Rs.)
Amount offered in Resolution plan to stakeholders and CIRP Cost.43,64,00,000
CIRP cost upto 06-08-2025 over Rs. 89 Lacs as proposed in addendum to original resolution plan - actual CIRP cost is payable as per clause 60 as amended by addendum dated 22-12-22 of resolution plan.1,42,44,245
Discounted cash flow value to homebuyers under option2 of plan (discounted @7% p.a.) - 100% of admitted claim after 3 years.15,33,13,325
SRA's proposal towards Construction Cost of Rs. 222 Crores, Approvals of Rs. 42 Crores and contingencies of Rs. 3.60 crores and approvals.267,60,00,000
Total327,99,57,570
Additionally, a regulatory fee @0.25% of the realisable amount to creditors plus applicable GST will be paid to IBBI on approval of plan under section 31 of IBC.
5.Voting percentage (%) of CoC in favour of Resolution Plan.100%
5.

Details of implementation of the Resolution Plan:

Sl. NoParticularsDescription
1.Amount of Performance Guarantee furnished by SRA (in Rs.) and its validity4,72,40,000/-
2.Sources of Funds (in brief)The sources of funds mix of SRA's promoter contribution in equity and Debt and sales collections.
3.Capital restructuring and management of the Corporate Debtor post approval of resolution plan (in brief including shareholding proposed to be transferred in favour of SRAa) The existing paid-up share capital shall stand fully written down (“Capital Reduction”). b) The Resolution Applicant shall infuse Rs. 2.50 Crores through issue of equity shares by Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Applicant shall reserve the right to recast/revalue the Balance Sheet post-acquisition. (As per Exhibit 3.7 of the Resolution Plan).
4.Term and implementation of the Plan (in brief)On and from the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, and till the occurrence of the Transfer Date, the Corporate Debtor shall be managed by the Implementation and Monitoring Committee.
5.Details of monitoring committee (in brief)Monitoring Committee (the MC) shall comprise the following: i. One representative of Resolution Applicant ii. One representative of Lenders iii. Resolution Professional iv. One representative of Homebuyers, only in observer capacity, without any voting.
Note: For the purpose of representation of Homebuyer in the MC, kindly refer to minutes of 29% CoC meeting held on 23-04-2026 and email dated 24-04-2026 rom SRA.
6.Effective date of resolution plan implementationThe date of approval of Resolution Plan by Adjudicating Authority.
6.

The list of financial creditors of the CD being members of the CoC and distribution of voting share among them is as under:

Sl. NoName of CreditorVoting Share (%)Voting for Resolution Plan (Voted for / Dissented / Abstained)
1.JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited57.38%Voted for
2.Asset Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Limited9.91%Voted for
3.82 Home Buyers18.39%Voted for
4.Axis Bank Limited4.57%Voted for
5.Pray Projects Private Limited7.69%Voted for
6.S.N. Damani Holdings Private2.03%Voted for
7.Mr. Sanjay Ranade 0.03%0.03%Abstain from voting by not voting.

7A. Realisable Amount:

Sl. No.ParticularsDescription
1.Total Realisable amount under the plan (In case of real estate CDs, provide the monetary value of flats etc. given to allottees)Rs.60,39,57,570/- This includes additional CIRP Cost of Rs. 1,42,44,245 upto 06.08.2025, over the cost proposed in addendum to resolution plan (actual CIRP cost is payable as per clause 60 as amended by addendum dated 22.12.22 of the resolution plan) and Monetary Value of flats given to Allottees Rs. 15,33,13,325 calculated by deriving present value of amount offered in Resolution Plan under Option 2 to Allottees. Total Plan Value is derived as follows:
Amount offered Resolution plan to creditors 43,64,00,000
CIRP cost over Rs. 89 Lacs as proposed in addendum to original resolution plan - actual CIRP cost is payable 1,42,44,245
as per clause 60 as amended by addendum dated 22.12.2022 of resolution plan
Discounted cash flow value to home buyers under option 2 (discounted | @7% p.a.) - 100% of admitted claim after 3 years15,33,13,325
TotalRs.60,39,57,570
Further SRA proposed to provide towards Construction Cost for Rs. 222 Crores over a period of time for completion of construction, Rs. 42 Crores for various approvals and Rs.3.60 crores for other contingencies. Additionally, a regulatory fee @ 0.25% of the realisable amount to creditors plus applicable GST will be paid to IBBI on approval of plan under section 31 of IBC.
2.Fair Value71,05,14,200 Note: Shop no. 1 & 9 and Office No. 1 & 2 in a completed project of CD, were transferred to a 3rd party prior to commencement of CIRP, an IA has been filed by resolution profession to reclaim possession. As per valuation report the Fair Value of assets is Rs.16.33 crore, however valuer noted that CD does not have ownership of these assets hence Fair value and liquidation value of this assets is assigned as NIL.
3.Liquidation Value48,21,32,700 Note: Shop no.1 & 9 and Office No. 1 & 2 in a completed project of CD, were transferred to a 3rd party prior to commencement of CIRP, an IA has been filed by resolution profession to reclaim possession. As per valuation report the Liquidation Value of assets is Rs. 8.16 crore, however valuer noted that CD does not have ownership of these assets hence Fair value and liquidation value of this asset is assigned as NIL.
4.Percentage (%) of realisable amount to Fair Value85.00%
5.Percentage (%) of realisable125.27%
amount to Liquidation Value
6.Percentage (%) of realisable amount to Principal amount25.04% to All Creditors
7.Percentage (%) of realisable amount to Total admitted claims21.81% to admitted claim of All Creditors.
8.Percentage (%) of realisable amount to Other than admitted Corporate Guarantee claims21.81% to admitted claim of All Creditors.

7B. Details of Realizable amount

(Amount in Rupees)

Category and Sub- category of stakeholderAmount ClaimedAmount AdmittedAmount under the Plan #% of Amount Provide d to the Amount claime dPayment Schedule
1. Secured Financial Creditors
Assenting74,45,15,38068,71,02,45835,00,00,000 Note: The 35 Crores Resolution Applicant proposed in addendum to Resolution plan to forgo the rights and47.01%Upfront Rs. 35 Crores
claims on the Securities offered to financial creditor - ACRE against their admitted claim of Rs. 10.12 Crores. The assets were transferred to a 3rd party prior to commencement of CIRP, an IA has been filed by resolution profession to reclaim possession, as per valuation report the Fair Value of assets is Rs.16.33 crore, however valuer noted that CD does not have ownership of these assets hence Fair value and liquidation value of this asset is assigned as NIL.
2. Unsecured Financial Creditors
Assenting49,31,08,486 (Including Homebuyer's claim of Rs.30.15 Crore)33,56,82,865 (Including Homebuyers admitted claim of Rs.18.95 Crore)21,33,13,325 (Including value of home buyer's entitlement derived by discounting the cash flow value to homebuyers under option 2 (discounted @7%43.26%To other than home buyers: Payable in E + 45 Days Homebuyers have been given 3 options i.e. deliver of flat, and 2
p.a.) 100% of admitted claim after 3 years. Rs.15,33,13,324 and to other unsecured creditors rs.6 crorespayment options. Note: Kindly refer to the minutes of 29th CoC meeting held on 23-04-2026 and email dated 24-04-2026 from SRA
Operational Creditors
(i)Government4,67,43,5874,67,43,5875,00,0001.07%Upfront
(iii) Employees3,34,72,3832,33,31,776200,0000.60%Upfront
(iv) Other Operational Creditors23,43,14,9919,84,72,46010,00,0000.43%Upfront
Other debts and dues2,86,76,45,7741,57,79,82,9841,58,00,0000.55%Upfront
Total441,98,00,601276,93,16,13058,08,13,325

9. Steps to be taken by the concerned parties post approval of resolution plan by AA

Sr. NoActivityTimeline
PHASE I – APPROVAL PROCESS OF THE PROPOSED PLAN
1.Presentation of Proposed Plan to the CoCX
2.Approval of Proposed Plan by CoCX + 7
3.Application to NCLTX + 15
4.Approval by NCLT ('NCLT Approval Date' or 'Effective Date')E
5.Notice on the Company's WebsiteE + 14
6.Intimation to the Stock Exchanges, CoC, IBBI, SEBI, RBI, Tax authorities and various other statutory authorities (as applicable)
7.Intimation to all Creditors, existing shareholders and other stakeholders of the Company.
PHASE II- SETTLEMENT OF CREDITORS
8.Payment of CIRP Costs as approved by CoCE + 45 days
9.Payment to Operational CreditorsE + 45 days
10.Payment to Financial CreditorsE + 45 days* (Expect Homebuyers, who have been given 3 options as mentioned in Exhibit 3.4 clause (c) of Resolution Plan, read along-with addendum to Resolution Plan).
PHASE III- IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSED PLAN
11.Change in Memorandum and Articles of Association and other documentation as required under the proposed plan.E+45 Days
12Management of Company
Constitution of new BoardE+45 Days*
Appointment of key managerial personnel; andE+45 Days*
Resolution Applicant shall appoint statutory auditors of their choice, subject to applicable regulationsE+45 Days

*Note: Kindly refer to the minutes of 29th CoC meeting held on 23-04-2026 and email dated 24-04-2026 from SRA.

11.

Amount of Regulatory fee payable (0.25%) to the Board under Regulation 31 A-: Rs.17,13,399/- (including 18% GST). SRA has confirmed actual CIRP cost shall be payable as per clause 60 as amended by addendum dated 22-12-2022 of the Resolution Plan, further, as per regulation 31(ba) of CIRP regulations, the CIRP cost includes regulatory fees payable to the Board under Regulation 31A

12.

Status of Preferential, Undervalued, Fraudulent and Extortionate transactions and how these are dealt in the resolution plan, if any:

Sl. NoType of transactionAmountDate of filing with Adjudicating AuthorityDate of order of the Adjudicating AuthorityHow it is dealt in resolution plan
1.Preferential transactions u/s. 4319,35,00,00002.02.2023-Refer note below
2.Fraudulent transactions u/s. 669,41,06,71802.02.2023-Refer note below
Total28,76,06,718

Note: As per Resolution Plan (page 11), any receivables which accrues to the CD from any third party, as well as any receivables which may accrue to the CD as a result of any proceedings under IBC (including but limited to proceedings where any transaction is avoided/set aside by the Adjudicating Authority in terms of Section 43,45,47,49,50 or 66 of the IBC) shall before the benefit of the approving Financial Creditors and shall be a pass-through to the Financial Creditors net of expenses, if any

13.

If resolution Plan submitted by suspended directors/ promoters of CD, Any PUFE applications against the suspended directors are pending, if so the details of the same- Not Applicable.

14.

Details of other IAs pending against the Corporate Debtor:

Filing NoDate of ApplicationApplicants nameRespondents nameAmount Involved, if anyIssue Involved (in brief)
IA. 2145/202319.05.2023Ashish VyasNANAApproval of Resolution Plan
IA. 1152/202323.03.2022Ashish Vyas1. Rajan Kumar Chhibber. 2. Payal Mahendra Parekh 3. Ateev Vrajlal Gala-Handover of four mortgaged properties in possession of R1 and R2
I.A. 1395 of 202302.02.2023Ashish Vyas1. Vijaygroup Realty LLP. 2. Shivkrupa Constructions and Developers Pvt Limited. 3. Ateev Vrajlal Gala.28,76,06,718CD being hit by PUFE transaction u/s. 43 r/w Section 66 of IBC, 2016.
I.A. 2310 of 202220.08.2022Ashish VyasAteev Gala-Non-Compliance of direction of Adjudicating Authority
16.

Whether the Resolution Plan is subject to any contingency/ condition -No.

17.

The Resolution Plan has been filed 667 days after the commencement of CIRP (in terms of Section 12 of the Code).

Declarations with respect to compliances of provisions under Code and Regulations

(i)

I Ashish Vyas hereby certify that-

(i)

the said Resolution Plan complies with all the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (Code), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP Regulations) including the provisions and Regulations as per the table below:

Section of the Code/ Regulation No.Requirement with respect to the Resolution PlanCompliance and Relevant Clause of Resolution Plan
Section 25(2)(h):The Resolution Applicant meets the criteria approved by the CoC having regard to the complexity and scale of operations of business of the CD.Yes
Section 29A:The Resolution Applicant is eligible to submit resolution plan as per final list of Resolution Professional or Order, if any, of the Adjudicating Authority.Yes
Section 30 (1)The Resolution Applicant has submitted an affidavit stating that it is eligible.Yes
Section 30 (2)The Resolution Plan- (a) provides for payment of insolvency resolution process costs. (b) provides for the payment of the debts of operational credit.Yes Exhibit 3.3, Page 57 Yes Exhibit 3.5 and Exhibit 3.6, Page 60
(c) provides for the payment to the financial creditors who did not vote in favour of the resolution plan?Yes Section 3- Resolution Plan- “Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Para B, Page 53
(d) provides for the management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor.Yes Exhibit 3.8.2 Page 67
(e) provides for implementation and supervision of the resolution plan?Yes Exhibit 3.8.2 Page 63
(f) Does not contravene any of the provisions of the law for the time being in force?No Section 3- Resolution Plan “Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Para B, Page 52
Section 30(4)a) The Resolution Plan is feasible and viable, according to the CoC. (b) has been approved by the CoC with 66% voting share?Yes
Section 31(1)The Resolution Plan has provisions for its effective implementation Plan, according to CoC.Yes
Regulation 38(1)The amount due to the operational creditors under the resolution plan has been given priority in payment over financial creditors.Yes Section 3 Resolution Plan “Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Para B, Page 53.
Regulation 38 (1A)The resolution plan includes a statement as to how it has dealt with the interests of all Stakeholders.Yes Section 3 Resolution Plan “Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Para B, Page 52.
Regulation 38 (1B)Neither the Resolution Applicant nor any of its related parties has filed to implement or contributed to the failure of implementation of any resolution plan approved under the Code. If applicable the Resolution Applicant has submitted the statement giving details of such non-implementation.Yes Section 3 Resolution Plan “Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Para B, Page 52.
Regulation 38(2)The Resolution Plan provides: (a) the term of the plan and its implementation schedule. (b) for the management and control of the business of the corporate debtor during its term. (c) adequate means for supervising it implementation?Yes Exhibit 3.8, Page 63, Section 3-Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Para B, Page 53 and addendum Exhibit 3.8.2 Page 63 Exhibit 3.8
Regulation 38(3)The resolution plan demonstrates that- (a) It addresses the cause of default. (b) It is feasible and viable. (c) It has provisions for its effective implementation. (d) It has provisions for approvals required and the time for the same. (e) The Resolution Applicant has the capacity to implement the Resolution Plan?Yes Exhibit 3.1, Page 56 Yes Section 3 - Resolution Plan - “Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Para B, Page 54 Yes Section 3 Resolution Plan “Mandatory Content of Resolution Plan” Page 54. Yes Section 4.14, Page 98 Yes SRA has declared that it has capability to Implement the plan (Page 54). The brief about SRA and financials of the SRA is given in Exhibit 2.1.1 and 2.1.2, respectively.
Regulation 39 (2)Whether the RP has filed applications in respect of transactions observed, found or determined by him?Yes I.A.1395/2023
Regulation 39 (4)Provide details of performance security received, as referred to in sub-regulation (4A) of regulation 36B)Yes 4,72,40,000/- Note: (i)An amount of Rs. 200,00,000/- is deposited with Lead Lender ii) Fixed Deposit for an amount of Rs. 272,00,000/- is pledged to Lead Lender.

CIRP Cost

39.

The CIRP Cost was initially quantified at Rs. 89,00,000/- under the Resolution Plan. As per addendum dated 18.04.2023 additional CIRP Cost of Rs.11,00,000/- was proposed to be paid. As on the date of submission of Form H dated 27.10.2025 vide additional affidavit dated 28.10.2025 it is noticed that the CIRP Cost is estimated at Rs. 2,31,44,245/-. The Applicant further in Additional Affidavit dated 28.02.2026 has stated that the estimated CIRP Cost as on 19.03.2026 is Rs.3,08,46,753/-. The CIRP Cost shall be paid 100% in priority over other payments. Further, the SRA vide an email dated 26.03.2026 has undertaken to pay entire outstanding CIRP costs over and above the amounts payable under the Resolution Plan.

Eligibility under Section 29A of the Code

40.

The Hon'ble NCLAT vide order dated 01.08.2025 had set aside the order dated 01.12.2023 of this Tribunal wherein it was held that the SRA was not eligible under Section 29A. The Hon'ble NCLAT in its order dated 01.08.2025 observed as follows:

34.

In light of the above submissions, we find there is no cogent or credible evidence to establish the disqualification of the Appellant under Section 29A of the Code. Furthermore, the Ld. Adjudicating Authority has failed to consider the Resolution Plan was duly approved by the CoC with 100% voting share. Therefore, we allow the present Appeal as we find the objections raised by Respondent No. 1 are devoid of merit. The impugned order is thus set aside and hence the Ld. NCLT may now proceed to hear CA No.2145/2023, qua approval of plan on merit.

41.

The RP had also vide affidavit dated 01.08.2022 has stated that SRA is not ineligible under Section 29 A of the Code.

Monitoring Committee

42.

The Monitoring Committee shall comprise of following persons;

(i)

1 (one) person nominated by the Resolution Applicants,

(ii)

1(one) person nominated by the Lenders, and

(iii)

Resolution Professional, as Chairperson.

(iv)

Authorized Representative of Homebuyers (with no voting rights).

In response to query raised by this Tribunal the RP filed an Additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026 quoting that the SRA has mentioned that this arrangement of one representative of Home buyers with no voting rights shall ensure that homebuyers have access to all information pertaining to the implementation of the Resolution Plan and at the same time this change in the Monitoring Committee shall not affect the voting share of the parties in the Monitoring Committee as stipulated under the Resolution Plan.

New Board of Directors

43.

On the NCLT approval date, all the existing directors of the Corporate Debtor, shall be deemed to have resigned from the Board of the Corporate Debtor and the Board of the Corporate Debtor will be reconstituted to comprise of persons nominated by the Implementation and Monitoring Committee.

Management and Control of the Corporate Debtor

44.

The Corporate Debtor shall be managed in the following three phases:

i.

Phase I period- From date of approval by the CoC till the order of this Tribunal- will be managed by RP.

ii.

Phase II period- From the NCLT approval date till Transfer Date- will be managed by Monitoring Committee.

iii.

Phase III period- The Transfer onwards- Will be managed by the SRA.

45.

The Transfer Date shall mean the date on which the entire resolution plan amounts are paid to the all creditors (other than homebuyers).

46.

On perusal of the Resolution Plan, we find that the Resolution Plan provides for the following:

a)

Payment of CIRP Cost as specified under Section 30(2)(a) of the Code.

b)

Payment of Debts of Operational Creditors as specified under Section 30(2)(b) of the Code.

c)

For management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, after the approval of Resolution Plan, as specified under Section 30(2)(c) of the Code.

d)

The implementation and supervision of Resolution Plan by the RP and the CoC as specified under Section 30(2)(d) of the Code.

47.

The RP has complied with the requirement of the Code in terms of Section 30(2)(a) to 30(2)(f) and Regulations 38(1), 38(1)(a), 38(2)(a), 38(2)(b), 38(2)(c) & 38(3), 39(2), 39(4) of the Regulations.

48.

The Resolution Plan is not conditional.

49.

In K Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank & Others (2019) 12 SCC 150, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that if the CoC had approved the Resolution Plan by requisite percent of voting share, then as per section 30(6) of the Code, it is imperative for the Resolution Professional to submit the same to the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT). On receipt of such a proposal, the Adjudicating Authority is required to satisfy itself that the Resolution Plan, as approved by CoC, meets the requirements specified in Section 30(2). The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that the role of the NCLT is ‘no more and no less’. The Hon’ble Apex Court further held that the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority is circumscribed by Section 31 and is limited to scrutiny of the Resolution Plan “as approved” by the requisite percent of voting share of financial creditors. Even in that enquiry, the grounds on which the Adjudicating Authority can reject the Resolution Plan is in reference to matters specified in Section 30(2) when the Resolution Plan does not conform to the stated requirements

50.

In Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited through Authorised Signatory Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors (2020) 8 SCC 531, the Hon’ble Apex Court clearly laid down that the Adjudicating Authority would not have power to modify the Resolution Plan which the CoC in their commercial wisdom has approved.

51.

In view of the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court, the commercial wisdom of the COC is to be given paramount importance for approval / rejection of the resolution plan. As the Resolution Plan meets the requirements of the Code and the IBBI Regulations including the requirement under Section 30 (2) of the Code, the Resolution Plan submitted by M/s. Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited and J.P. Infra Reality Private Limited is hereby approved, subject to the following order/ directions:

i.

The Addendum dated 18.04.2023, Additional Affidavits dated 20.06.2023 28.10.2025, 30.10.2025, 28.03.2026, 07.04.2026, 28.04.2026, clarifications and undertakings by the SRA and RP are taken on record and shall form part of the Resolution Plan.

ii.

The resolution plan shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor, shareholders and creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority.

iii.

The Effective Date shall be the date of approval by the Adjudicating Authority.

iv.

The Transfer Date shall mean the date on which the entire resolution plan amounts are paid to the all creditors (other than homebuyers).

v.

The Resolution Applicant shall keep the Performance Bank Guarantee of Rs. 4,72,40,000/- valid till the entire term of Resolution Plan

vi.

The SRA shall pay Rs. 11.82 lakhs to pay gratuity and Provident Fund to employees of the Corporate Debtor. This payment will be in addition to the amount mentioned in the Resolution plan

vii.

If ACRE, who is one of the secured creditors, recovers amount in excess of its admitted claim then ACRE shall pay such excess amount to the Corporate Debtor after satisfaction of the entire debt owed by the Corporate Debtor to ACRE.

viii.

The SRA shall pay the entire outstanding CIRP costs, over and above the other amounts payable under the Resolution Plan within Effective Date (E) + 45 days.

ix.

The SRA shall pay entire resolution plan amounts payable to all creditors (except homebuyers) within 45 days of the date of this order.

x.

The SRA has confirmed that both the members of the SRA i.e. Shree Krishna Structure Private Limited and JP Infra Realty Private Limited shall be jointly and severally liable for full implementation of the Resolution Plan. It is noted that the SRA has further stated that Shree Krishna Structures Private Limited has, inter-alia, undertaken to bear the primary responsibility and liability in making the required payments under the Resolution Plan as well as the other compliances under law.

xi.

The Monitoring Committee shall supervise the implementation of the Resolution Plan and shall review operational performance of the Corporate Debtor during the Phase II period. The Monitoring Committee shall also include one Authorised representative of homebuyers in addition to the representatives of SRA and Lenders and Resolution Professional. The Authorised Representative of homebuyers shall have no voting rights in the meetings of the Monitoring Committee.

xii.

The Resolution Professional is directed to handover premises / documents to Resolution Applicant for starting of the operations as contemplated under the Resolution Plan. The Resolution professional shall handover all the records after the Transfer date. The Resolution Applicant shall have access to premises / documents through Resolution Professional to finalise further line of action for starting of the operations.

xiii.

Though, it is certified by the Resolution Professional that the Resolution Plan does not contravene any provision of law for the time being in force in terms of Section 30(2)(e) of the Code, however, as an abundant caution, it is made clear that in case of any inconsistency between any law for the time being in force and the provisions of this Resolution Plan, the provisions contained in the law shall prevail unless relaxed in terms of this Order.

52. Reliefs and Concessions:

a)

In terms of the Judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited Vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, on the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims which are not part of Resolution Plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect of a claim which is not a part of the Resolution Plan.

b)

It is further clarified that any benefit arising out of the Resolution Plan shall not be deemed to be automatically granted. The Resolution Applicant shall approach the competent authorities under the applicable law for availing such benefits and concessions as may be permitted under the law.

c)

Any exemption/ waiver/reduction sought for in relation to the payment of registration fees, charges, stamp duty, taxes and fees arising out of the actions contemplated under the Resolution Plan is not granted but the Resolution Applicant is at liberty to approach Competent Authorities for such request if permitted under the law.

d)

Approval of the Resolution Plan shall not be a ground for termination of any existing consents, approvals, licenses, concessions, authorizations, permits or the like that has been granted to the Corporate debtor or for which the Corporate Debtor has made an application for renewal, grant permissions, sanctions, consents, approvals, allowances, exemptions etc.

e)

For past non-compliances of the Corporate debtor under applicable laws the Resolution Applicant shall not be liable for any liabilities and offences committed prior to the commencement of CIRP and as stipulated under Section 32A of IBC, 2016.

f)

No orders levying any tax, demand or penalty from the Corporate Debtor in relation to period prior to commencement of CIRP shall be passed by any authority and such demand, if created, shall not be enforceable as having extinguished in terms of approved Resolution Plan.

g)

The carry forward of losses and unabsorbed depreciation shall be subject to the provisions of Income Tax Act or Rules made thereunder, and the Income Tax Department shall be at liberty to examine the same.

h)

Further, the concerned indirect tax authorities shall be at liberty to examine the carry forward of input tax credit available under Indirect Tax laws.

i)

The Applicant shall file necessary forms and pay prescribed fees, if any, in terms of provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in relation to issuance of fresh capital and reduction in share capital. Issue of new shares and reduction of share capital as provided under the resolution plan is subject to the treatment in accordance with the applicable laws, taxation and compliances.

j)

Application for compounding/condoning shall be filed in accordance with the procedure specified in respective law or concerned authority, however, Resolution Applicant shall not be responsible for past non-compliances till the date of approval of this Plan.

k)

The ROC shall update the records upon filing of pending returns/forms after payment of normal fees (without not additional fee). In case such filing is not permitted by the e-filing portal, the ROC shall accept such forms/returns in physical format and do the needful.

l)

With regard to other concessions and reliefs, most of them are subsumed in the reliefs granted above the relief which is not expressly granted above, shall not be construed as granted. The exemptions if any sought in violation of any law in force, it is hereby clarified that such exemptions shall be construed as not granted.

m)

Any amount realized out of the action taken against other persons for avoidance transactions under the IBC, 2016 also Unauthorized Transaction post CIRP order, shall be appropriated towards the unsatisfied claims of Financial Creditors.

n)

The Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA) shall accordingly be amended and filed with the concerned Registrar of Companies (RoC), for information and record. The Resolution Applicant, for effective implementation of the Plan, shall obtain all necessary approvals, under any law for the time being in force, within such period as may be prescribed.

o)

The moratorium under Section 14 of the Code shall cease to have effect from this date.

p)

The Applicant shall forward all records relating to the conduct of the CIRP and the Resolution Plan to the IBBI along with copy of this Order for information.

q)

The Applicant shall forthwith send a certified copy of this Order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant, respectively for necessary compliance.

53.

The grant or non-grant of reliefs under the Resolution Plan will not affect the implementation of the Resolution Plan and the same should not be viewed as conditionalities to the implementation of the Resolution Plan or any timelines for such implementation.

54.

In result, the Resolution Plan is hereby approved with directions in Para 51 and 52 above. As per revised Form H enclosed to additional Affidavit dated 28.04.2026, the Resolution Plan value has been mentioned as Rs.327,99,57,570/- inclusive of CIRP Cost of Rs. 1,42,44,245/- as on 06.08.2025. However, the CIRP Cost has increased to Rs.3,08,46,753/- as per Additional Affidavit dated 28.03.2026. The Resolution Plan value does not include the amount of Rs. 11.82 lakhs which is to be kept separately for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity in addition to the Resolution Plan amount.

55.

Accordingly, I.A. 2145 of 2023 is disposed of.