Tribunals and Commissions(2003) 02 NCDRC CK 0097

R.C.RAJESHEKAR vs ANIL HARIDASS

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 19 February 2003 · Citation: 2003 4 CPJ 86

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.S.Gupta , Rajyalakshmi Rao , B.K.Taimni J.
RESULT
Revision Petition dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 169 words
1.

IN the complaint filed by respondents/complainants it is stated that they had placed orders on petitioner/opposite party for installation of 200x2 LPD Tata Bp Solar Water Heaters on 13.1.1999 and 22.1.1999. Cost of both these was Rs. 24,500/- each. However, solar water heaters which were installed by the petitioner were of different make. After considering parties evidence, petitioner was directed to replace the water heaters of Tata Bp make failing which he was to pay Rs. 49,000/- being the costs thereof by the order dated 2.2.2001 by the District Forum. Appeal filed by the petitioner against this order was dismissed by the State Commission by the order dated 1.1.2003. IN view of concurrent findings recorded by District Forum as also State Commission that the two water heaters installed by the petitioner were of a make different form for which the orders were placed, we do not find it a fit case to exercise our jurisdiction under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Dismissed. Revision Petition dismissed.