High CourtsDivision Bench(1892) 07 MAD CK 0003

Rayakkal and Others vs Subbanna

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 July 1892 · Citation: (1893) ILR (Mad) 84

HON’BLE JUDGES
Parker, J · Arthur J.H. Collins, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 164 words
1.

The plea that some of the items of plaint property were the self-acquisition of Palani Gounden does not appear to have been pressed before the

District Judge and apparently there is no evidence in support of the contention.

2.

The deeds of stridhanam executed to the two daughters were executed after their marriage, and without the consent of plaintiff who was a

minor, and together with the deed in favour of first defendant, they amount to more than half of the ancestral property. No authority in support of a

Hindu father''s power to make such an alienation of ancestral Immovable property has been quoted at the bar, and we find that, in a similar case,

the Allahabad High Court on the suit of a minor son held that such an alienation must be set aside, not only to the extent of the father''s share, but

altogether--Ganga Bisheshar v. Pirthi Pal ILR 2 All. 635.

3.

The second appeal must be dismissed with costs.