High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 P&H CK 1728

Ravinder Pal & Anr. vs Baldev Krishan & Ors.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Deepak Gupta, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CR-6850-2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

78 paragraphs · 2,690 words

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

The petitioners, defendants No.1 and 2 before the learned trialThe petitioners, defendants No.1 and 2 before the learned trialThe petitioners, defendants No.1 and 2 before the learned trialThe petitioners, defendants No.1 and 2 before the learned trial
Court, have invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court to assail the orderCourt, have invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court to assail the orderCourt, have invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court to assail the orderCourt, have invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court to assail the order
dated 13.08.2026 padated 13.08.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sangrur,ssed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sangrur,ssed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sangrur,
whereby their application seeking stay of the proceedings for preparation of thewhereby their application seeking stay of the proceedings for preparation of thewhereby their application seeking stay of the proceedings for preparation of thewhereby their application seeking stay of the proceedings for preparation of the
final decree in the partition suit has been dismissed.final decree in the partition suit has been dismissed.final decree in the partition suit has been dismissed.
LearnedLearnedLearned counselcounselcounsel forforfor thethethepetitionerspetitionerspetitioners submitssubmitssubmits thatthatthat ananan exexexparteparte
preliminarypreliminarypreliminarypreliminarydecreedecreedecreedecree ofofofof partitionpartitionpartitionpartition waswaswaswas passedpassedpassedpassedonononon 06.04.202606.04.202606.04.202606.04.2026 andandandand thatthatthatthatthethethethe
petitioners have already moved an application under Order IX Rule 13 read withpetitioners have already moved an application under Order IX Rule 13 read withpetitioners have already moved an application under Order IX Rule 13 read withpetitioners have already moved an application under Order IX Rule 13 read with
Section 151 CPC seeking setting aside of the said decree. It is contended thatSection 151 CPC seeking setting aside of the said decree. It is contended thatSection 151 CPC seeking setting aside of the said decree. It is contended thatSection 151 CPC seeking setting aside of the said decree. It is contended that
unless the final decreunless the final decree proceedings are stayed, the petitioners would suffere proceedings are stayed, the petitioners would suffere proceedings are stayed, the petitioners would suffer
prejudice in the event their application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC ultimatelyprejudice in the event their application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC ultimatelyprejudice in the event their application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC ultimatelyprejudice in the event their application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC ultimately

succeeds.

The submission, though attractive at first blush, does not meritThe submission, though attractive at first blush, does not meritThe submission, though attractive at first blush, does not meritThe submission, though attractive at first blush, does not merit
acceptance in the facts and circumstancesacceptance in the facts and circumstances of the present case.of the present case.
The impugned order records that, according to the respondents, theThe impugned order records that, according to the respondents, theThe impugned order records that, according to the respondents, theThe impugned order records that, according to the respondents, the
petitioners had appeared in the suit on 01.07.2023 and thereafter continued topetitioners had appeared in the suit on 01.07.2023 and thereafter continued topetitioners had appeared in the suit on 01.07.2023 and thereafter continued topetitioners had appeared in the suit on 01.07.2023 and thereafter continued to
appear up toappear up toappear up toappear up to08.05.2025.08.05.2025.08.05.2025.08.05.2025. They failed toThey failed toThey failed toThey failed tofile replyfile replyfile replyfile reply totototo the application forthe application forthe application forthe application for
production of documents despite having availed several opportunities and evenof documents despite having availed several opportunities and evenof documents despite having availed several opportunities and evenof documents despite having availed several opportunities and even
after imposition of costs, whereafter they were proceeded against ex parte. Theafter imposition of costs, whereafter they were proceeded against ex parte. Theafter imposition of costs, whereafter they were proceeded against ex parte. Theafter imposition of costs, whereafter they were proceeded against ex parte. The
learned trial Court has further recorded that the petitioners have already filed anlearned trial Court has further recorded that the petitioners have already filed anlearned trial Court has further recorded that the petitioners have already filed anlearned trial Court has further recorded that the petitioners have already filed an
application under Orderapplication under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and, after hearing the parties, an issueIX Rule 13 CPC and, after hearing the parties, an issueIX Rule 13 CPC and, after hearing the parties, an issue
has been framed regarding the validity of the ex parte preliminary decree. Thehas been framed regarding the validity of the ex parte preliminary decree. Thehas been framed regarding the validity of the ex parte preliminary decree. Thehas been framed regarding the validity of the ex parte preliminary decree. The
matter has been fixed for the petitioners' evidence.matter has been fixed for the petitioners' evidence.matter has been fixed for the petitioners' evidence.
Thus, the petitioners are not remediless. Their grievance regarThus, the petitioners are not remediless. Their grievance regarThus, the petitioners are not remediless. Their grievance regardingding
the ex parte preliminary decree is already pending consideration before thethe ex parte preliminary decree is already pending consideration before thethe ex parte preliminary decree is already pending consideration before thethe ex parte preliminary decree is already pending consideration before the
competent Court in proceedings under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The mere filing ofcompetent Court in proceedings under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The mere filing ofcompetent Court in proceedings under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The mere filing ofcompetent Court in proceedings under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The mere filing of
such an application cannot, as a matter of course, confer upon the petitioners asuch an application cannot, as a matter of course, confer upon the petitioners asuch an application cannot, as a matter of course, confer upon the petitioners asuch an application cannot, as a matter of course, confer upon the petitioners a
right to stall the consequential proceedings arising from the preliminary decree,he consequential proceedings arising from the preliminary decree,he consequential proceedings arising from the preliminary decree,he consequential proceedings arising from the preliminary decree,
particularly when the record reflects that their ex parte status was preceded byparticularly when the record reflects that their ex parte status was preceded byparticularly when the record reflects that their ex parte status was preceded byparticularly when the record reflects that their ex parte status was preceded by
their participation in the suit and their failure to comply with the opportunitiestheir participation in the suit and their failure to comply with the opportunitiestheir participation in the suit and their failure to comply with the opportunitiestheir participation in the suit and their failure to comply with the opportunities
granted by the trial Courtgranted by the trial Court.
The learned trial Court has also noticed that the proceedingsThe learned trial Court has also noticed that the proceedingsThe learned trial Court has also noticed that the proceedingsThe learned trial Court has also noticed that the proceedings
presentlypresentlypresentlypresentlypendingpendingpendingpending forforforfor preparationpreparationpreparationpreparation ofofofof thethethethefinalfinalfinalfinal decreedecreedecreedecree involve,involve,involve,involve, interinterinterinteralia,alia,alia,alia,
measurementmeasurementmeasurementmeasurementofofofof thethethethe propertypropertypropertyproperty bybybyby thethethetheFieldFieldFieldField KanungoKanungoKanungoKanungo throughthroughthroughthrough DGPSDGPSDGPSDGPSandandandand
submission of a report regarding the factual psubmission of a report regarding the factual psubmission of a report regarding the factual position and proposed mode ofosition and proposed mode of
partition. The Court has specifically recorded that the Field Kanungo is onlypartition. The Court has specifically recorded that the Field Kanungo is onlypartition. The Court has specifically recorded that the Field Kanungo is onlypartition. The Court has specifically recorded that the Field Kanungo is only
required to place the factual position and proposed mode of partition before therequired to place the factual position and proposed mode of partition before therequired to place the factual position and proposed mode of partition before therequired to place the factual position and proposed mode of partition before the

Court.

More importantly, the conduct of the petitioners does noMore importantly, the conduct of the petitioners does noMore importantly, the conduct of the petitioners does not justifyt justify
exercise of the discretionary revisional jurisdiction in their favour. A party, whichexercise of the discretionary revisional jurisdiction in their favour. A party, whichexercise of the discretionary revisional jurisdiction in their favour. A party, whichexercise of the discretionary revisional jurisdiction in their favour. A party, which
has remained absent after participating in the proceedings and after availinghas remained absent after participating in the proceedings and after availinghas remained absent after participating in the proceedings and after availinghas remained absent after participating in the proceedings and after availing
opportunities cannot, merely by subsequently invoking Order IX Rule 13 CPC,opportunities cannot, merely by subsequently invoking Order IX Rule 13 CPC,opportunities cannot, merely by subsequently invoking Order IX Rule 13 CPC,opportunities cannot, merely by subsequently invoking Order IX Rule 13 CPC,
claim an automatic suspension of all consequential proceedings. The remedyan automatic suspension of all consequential proceedings. The remedyan automatic suspension of all consequential proceedings. The remedyan automatic suspension of all consequential proceedings. The remedy
under Order IX Rule 13 CPC has to be adjudicated on its own merits, and theunder Order IX Rule 13 CPC has to be adjudicated on its own merits, and theunder Order IX Rule 13 CPC has to be adjudicated on its own merits, and theunder Order IX Rule 13 CPC has to be adjudicated on its own merits, and the
petitioners would be entitled to establish their plea before the learned trialpetitioners would be entitled to establish their plea before the learned trialpetitioners would be entitled to establish their plea before the learned trialpetitioners would be entitled to establish their plea before the learned trial

Court.

At this stage, howevAt this stage, however, no ground is made out for interdicting theer, no ground is made out for interdicting theer, no ground is made out for interdicting the
final decree proceedings altogether. The observation of the learned trial Courtfinal decree proceedings altogether. The observation of the learned trial Courtfinal decree proceedings altogether. The observation of the learned trial Courtfinal decree proceedings altogether. The observation of the learned trial Court
regarding the petitioners not having approached the Court with entirely cleanregarding the petitioners not having approached the Court with entirely cleanregarding the petitioners not having approached the Court with entirely cleanregarding the petitioners not having approached the Court with entirely clean
hands also cannot be said to be wholly irrelevant.hands also cannot be said to be wholly irrelevant.hands also cannot be said to be wholly irrelevant. The Court has recorded thatThe Court has recorded that
when the Field Kanungo went to the spot, members of the Kisan Unionwhen the Field Kanungo went to the spot, members of the Kisan Unionwhen the Field Kanungo went to the spot, members of the Kisan Unionwhen the Field Kanungo went to the spot, members of the Kisan Union
obstructed him from carrying out the proceedings and has noticed the questionobstructed him from carrying out the proceedings and has noticed the questionobstructed him from carrying out the proceedings and has noticed the questionobstructed him from carrying out the proceedings and has noticed the question
whether such obstruction was at the behest of the petitioners. Though this Courtwhether such obstruction was at the behest of the petitioners. Though this Courtwhether such obstruction was at the behest of the petitioners. Though this Courtwhether such obstruction was at the behest of the petitioners. Though this Court
does not propose to return any finding on that allegation, the overall conduct ofoes not propose to return any finding on that allegation, the overall conduct ofoes not propose to return any finding on that allegation, the overall conduct ofoes not propose to return any finding on that allegation, the overall conduct of
the petitioners, as emerging from the impugned order, certainly does notthe petitioners, as emerging from the impugned order, certainly does notthe petitioners, as emerging from the impugned order, certainly does notthe petitioners, as emerging from the impugned order, certainly does not
warrant an equitable order staying the consequential proceedings.warrant an equitable order staying the consequential proceedings.warrant an equitable order staying the consequential proceedings.
At the same time, the pendencyAt the same time, the pendencyAt the same time, the pendency of the application under Order IXAt the same time, the pendency of the application under Order IXof the application under Order IX
Rule 13 CPC deserves to be appropriately safeguarded. Continuation of the finalRule 13 CPC deserves to be appropriately safeguarded. Continuation of the finalRule 13 CPC deserves to be appropriately safeguarded. Continuation of the finalRule 13 CPC deserves to be appropriately safeguarded. Continuation of the final
decree proceedings should not be construed as foreclosing or prejudicing thedecree proceedings should not be construed as foreclosing or prejudicing thedecree proceedings should not be construed as foreclosing or prejudicing thedecree proceedings should not be construed as foreclosing or prejudicing the
petitioners' statutory remedy. The final decree, if prepared, andpetitioners' statutory remedy. The final decree, if prepared, andpetitioners' statutory remedy. The final decree, if prepared, and any execution orany execution or
implementation thereof, would necessarily remain subject toimplementation thereof, would necessarily remain subject toimplementation thereof, would necessarily remain subject toimplementation thereof, would necessarily remain subject tothe ultimatethe ultimatethe ultimatethe ultimate
outcome of the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.outcome of the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.outcome of the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Consequently,Consequently,Consequently, thethethe presentpresentpresentrevisionrevisionrevision petitionpetitionpetition isisis. ItItis,is,
however, clarified that any final decrehowever, clarified that any final decree passed or any further proceedings takene passed or any further proceedings takene passed or any further proceedings taken
pursuant to the ex parte preliminary decree dated 06.04.2026 shall remainpursuant to the ex parte preliminary decree dated 06.04.2026 shall remainpursuant to the ex parte preliminary decree dated 06.04.2026 shall remainpursuant to the ex parte preliminary decree dated 06.04.2026 shall remain
subject to the final outcome of the petitioners' application under Order IX Rulesubject to the final outcome of the petitioners' application under Order IX Rulesubject to the final outcome of the petitioners' application under Order IX Rulesubject to the final outcome of the petitioners' application under Order IX Rule
13 read with Section 151 CPC13 read with Section 151 CPC. In the event the said applica. In the event the said application is ultimatelytion is ultimately
allowed and the ex parte preliminary decree is set aside, the consequentialallowed and the ex parte preliminary decree is set aside, the consequentialallowed and the ex parte preliminary decree is set aside, the consequentialallowed and the ex parte preliminary decree is set aside, the consequential
proceedings shall abide by and be dealt with in accordance with the order passedproceedings shall abide by and be dealt with in accordance with the order passedproceedings shall abide by and be dealt with in accordance with the order passedproceedings shall abide by and be dealt with in accordance with the order passed
in those proceedings.in those proceedings.
The learned trial Court shall endeavour to decide thThe learned trial Court shall endeavour to decide thThe learned trial Court shall endeavour to decide the applicatione application
under Order IX Rule 13 CPC expeditiously, in accordance with law, withoutunder Order IX Rule 13 CPC expeditiously, in accordance with law, withoutunder Order IX Rule 13 CPC expeditiously, in accordance with law, withoutunder Order IX Rule 13 CPC expeditiously, in accordance with law, without
granting unnecessary adjournments to either side. Nothing contained in thisgranting unnecessary adjournments to either side. Nothing contained in thisgranting unnecessary adjournments to either side. Nothing contained in thisgranting unnecessary adjournments to either side. Nothing contained in this
order shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of theorder shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of theorder shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of theorder shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the
application underapplication under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The said application shall be decidedOrder IX Rule 13 CPC. The said application shall be decidedOrder IX Rule 13 CPC. The said application shall be decided
independently on the basis of the pleadings and evidence led by the parties.independently on the basis of the pleadings and evidence led by the parties.independently on the basis of the pleadings and evidence led by the parties.
12.

PendingPendingPendingPending miscellaneousmiscellaneousmiscellaneousmiscellaneous application(s),application(s),application(s),application(s), ifififif any,any,any,any, shallshallshallshall alsoalsoalsoalso standstandstandstand disposed of.