Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 06 ITAT CK 1753

Ravinder Kumar vs ITO, Saharanpur

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 24 June 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhir Kumar, Judicial Member · Naveen Chandra, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 1330/DEL/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 193 words

PER SUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi/ Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] vide order dated 16.1.2026 pertaining to A.Y. 2019-20, arising out the assessment order under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (in short ‘the Act’).

2.

We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record. We find that Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal because the assessee did not file any submissions before him. In view of the aforesaid factual matrix and in the interest of justice, we deem it fit and proper to remit back the issues to the file of the Ld. CIT(A)/ NFAC with the directions to consider the issues afresh in appeal, in accordance with law by giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to appear before the Ld. NFAC and co-operate in the proceedings. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.