Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 04 ITAT CK 3275

Ravinder Juneja vs E-Assessment Unit, New Delhi

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 30 April 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhir Kumar, Judicial Member · Manish Agarwal, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 698/DEL/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 423 words

PER SUDHIR KUMAR, JM:

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the NFAC/CIT(A), Delhi (In short “Ld. CIT(A)”) dated 26-11-2025 pertaining to A.Y. 2020-21.

2.

The assessee has raised the following grounds in appeal :

1.

The AO/assessment unit has made the additions of Rs. 1,76,00,299/- on unjustified grounds in a biased manner without appreciating the facts of the case.

2.

That on the First Appellate Authority has also erred in deciding the case exparte since no notice was received by the party and there was no attempt to communicate through postal channels.

3.

That the NFAC First Appellate Authority has decided the matter not on merits but only for non-appearance / or making submissions which is also not in the interest of justice and therefore to be set aside.

4.

That the assessee appellant was denied the VC on being asked for an adjournment as the counsel of the appellant was out of station and was not able to attend the VC by the AO despite request having been made.

5.

That the documents submitted by the appellant were neither appreciated by the AO and nor by the NFAC / valuated in the justified manner and therefore, the order to be set aside.

6.

That the demand of Rs. 45,30,877/- has been made on unjustified grounds.

7.

That the denial of capitalization of interest on house is unjustified and denying the deduction on this ground is not justified.

8.

That the appellant prays to add, alter or amend any or all the grounds of appeal with her before or after the hearing of appeal.

3.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee.

4.

Ld. DR has submitted that the assessee is a non -cooperative, he did not participate in the proceedings before the Ld.CIT(A).

5.

We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the records. We find that in the instant case the Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-parte therefore, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair play, we deem fit proper to restore the issues to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to grant one opportunity to the assessee to substantiate his claim and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also directed to appear before the Ld.CIT(A) to substantiate his case. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.

6.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.