High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 10 UK CK 0032

Ravi Kashyap vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1030 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 449 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

This Application has been filed for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.818 of 2025, registered at Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar under Sections 318(3), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2.

Heard Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the respondent.

3.

According to the First Information Report dated 10.08.2025, in place of the informant, her property was sold to Ravi Kashyap (applicant) by another woman.

4.

Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, Advocate, contended that as per the respondent, the alleged sale-deed was registered on 04.07.2025. Applicant was arrested on 06.06.2025 in the First Information Report No.607 of 2025, under Section 8 read with Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and he was granted bail on 08.08.2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding. Applicant was granted interim bail on 24.09.2025, and, the conditions of the interim bail have not been violated by him.

5.

Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Brief Holder has opposed the anticipatory bail application.

6.

Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

7.

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed and the order dated 24.09.2025, granting interim bail to the applicant, is made absolute. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant-Ravi Kashyap, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicant shall attend the trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(iii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case;

(iv) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court.

8.

It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.