Tribunals and Commissions(1992) 11 NCDRC CK 0064

RAVI KANT, M.D., M/S. I.G.F. LEASING PVT. LTD. vs KAILASH CHAND

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 6 November 1992 · Citation: 1992 2 CPR 322 : 1992 3 CPJ 74 : 1994 1 CLT 309

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.Balakrishna Eradi , A.S.Vijayakar , Y.Krishan , B.S.Yadav J.
RESULT
Petition dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 186 words
1.

WE do not see any merit in these applications for restoration of the appeals which were dismissed for default is per our order dated 6thAugust, 1992. Further we may also state that under Section 13(4) of the Consumer Protection Act the power under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is not one of the powers incorporated in Clauses 1 to 6 of the said Sub-Section with the result that the Redressal Forum under the Consumer Protection Act have not been vested with the said power. The Counsel for the applicant argues that every Court or Forum which has the power to dismiss an appeal for default has also the inherent power to restore the case in the event of its being satisfied that the order of dismissal should be set aside. WE do not wish to finally pronounce open this question in this case but would only state that even if it is assumed that the legal position is as suggested by Counsel this is not a case where we consider it proper to exercise the said power. Dismissed. Petition dismissed.