High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 RAJ CK 0018

Ravi Das S/o Lala Ram vs State of Rajasthan Through PP

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 2 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
CASE NUMBER
1436 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 305 words

NMGOP

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material on record and the case diary.

2.

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the

petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R.

No.135/2016, Police Station Siwana, District Barmer for the

offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 354 and 451 IPC.

3.

The grievous injury caused to Durga Ram in this incident was

on his hand. Cross cases were registered between the parties.

The only non-bailable offence alleged against the petitioners is

under Section 452 IPC because the police did not find offence

under Section 354 IPC made out.

4.

Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and

circumstances of case and considering the arguments advanced at

the Bar, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners deserve to

be granted anticipatory bail.

5.

Resultantly, the instant bail application preferred on behalf of

the petitioners is allowed and it is directed that in the event of

arrest of petitioners (1) Ravi Das, (2) Mukesh, (3) Govind Ram,

(4) Mala Ram @ Maliya and (5) Ramesh Kumar in connection with

F.I.R. No.135/2016, Police Station Siwana, District Barmer, they

shall be released on bail; upon furnishing a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- each along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating

Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(i). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.