High CourtsFull Bench(1924) 12 BOM CK 0012

Ratanji Dorabji vs Kisandas Tribhovandas

Bombay High Court · Decided on 5 December 1924 · Citation: AIR 1925 Bom 302 : (1925) 27 BOMLR 340 : 94 Ind. Cas. 923

HON’BLE JUDGES
Norman Macleod, J · Marten, J · Crump, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
O.C.J. Suit No. 1127 of 1920 and Appeal No. 49 of 1920

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 115 words

Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.—We think that the learned Judge in the Court below was right in holding that the defendants'' consent to the proposed assignment of the lease had been unreasonably withheld, the ground being that there had been a dispute between the landlord and the tenant with regard to another letting. The learned Judge has found as a fact that there was a genuine dispute between the parties, that there was not a determination on the part of the tenant to decline to pay rent, but an objection to pay until the particulars of the tenancy had been definitely ascertained, which was not done till 1919. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed with costs.