High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 03 CAL CK 0047

RASMAHA ABSAR (MINOR) vs THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
PROTIK PRAKASH BANERJEE, J
CASE NUMBER
W.P No. 4017 (W) of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 391 words

The affidavit-of-service and the e-mail sent to the respondents be kept on record. The petitioner represented by his father has preferred the writ

petition inter alia praying for issuance of necessary direction upon the respondents to allow him to appear in the final examination of Class-XI in the

Kendriya Vidyalaya NTPC, Farakka (in short, the said school) which is scheduled to commence on and from 3rd March, 2018. The father of the

petitioner submits that the petitioner emerged to be successful in the terminal examination of ClassXI. Thereafter, though he attended the school

after recovering from his ailments, his attendance in class was not marked by the class teacher. The respondent no.4 was approached for

regularization of the attendance but in vain. Subsequently, in the month of February, 2018, the petitioner came to learn from a letter dated 16th

February, 2018, addressed to the guardian of another student that he would not be permitted to appear in the final examination of Class-XI.

Prima facie no reason towards denial of such permission has been incorporated in the document annexed at page 22 of the writ petition. For grant

of an interim order, the Court is required to put into the scales the need to protect the interest of the petitioner in the event the writ petition ultimately

succeeds inasmuch as in such eventuality, the petitioner would be faced with a fait accompli since by that time the examination would be over.

In the said conspectus of facts and reasons, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to an interim order.

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to participate in the final examination of Class-XI in the said school, which is due to

commence on and from 3rd March, 2018.

It is, however, made clear that such participation in the said examination would not create any equity in favour of the petitioner and his result shall not

be declared without the leave of the Court.

The respondents would be at liberty to file their affidavits-in-opposition within two weeks. Reply thereto, if any, be filed within a week thereafter.

List this matter for final hearing in the daily supplementary list of this Court on 10th April, 2018.

Urgent photostat plain copy of this order countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be given to the parties on priority basis.