High Courts(1920) 08 CAL CK 0043

Rash Behari Saha vs Phani Bhusan Haldar

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 9 August 1920

CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 623 of 1920

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 67 words

Chatterjea and Cuming, JJ.—We think that the Petitioners must first of all move the Sessions Judge u/s 435 and ask him to exercise his powers u/s 438.

2.

It is not the practice of this Court to entertain applications of this nature, unless the party has first moved the Sessions Judge to make a reference to this Court.

3.

The Rule is discharged on the above ground.