High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 10 P&H CK 0032

Ranjodh Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 October 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anita Chaudhry, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No.-15318 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 193 words

The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 191 dated 6.12.2017 registered at Police Station Morinda, District Roopnagar under Sections 354 IPC.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is in custody since 27.2.2018 and the FIR has been lodged with respect to an incident which

occurred in 2015. The counsel further submits that there was a property dispute after the petitioner's son had died and a suit was filed and the litigation

is pending. Counsel also submits that the statement of the prosecutrix has also been recorded and the complainant is living separately and not in his

house and the trial would take time and the allegations are under Section 354 IPC.

The case had been adjourned on the last date of hearing to enable the prosecution to record the statement of the prosecutrix. Statement of the

prosecutrix has been recorded. This fact is not disputed by the State counsel. The trial would take time.

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing

bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.