High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 MP CK 0096

Ranglal S/O Shivlal vs State Of M.P

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 13 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Rusia, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.40333 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 431 words

Vivek Rusia, J

This is first bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail on behalf of the applicant who is in jail since 19.01.2021 in connection

with Crime No.266/2020 registered at Police Station- Chapiheda, District Rajgarh for offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 325, 326, 336, 34 of

the IPC.

As per the prosecution story, complainant Shivpal Singh lodged a 'Dehati Nalishi' on 21-12-2017 that in the evening he was going to his house and

when he reached in front of the house of Suresh Sanghi, Suresh and Ranglal started abusing him because of the previous dispute in respect of the

land. Suresh assaulted him by means of 'lathi' and Ranglal assaulted him by means of 'Sariya' and he sustained injuries. He was medically examined

and eleven injuries were found.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the complainant in his statement u/s 161 of Cr.PC stated that his one tooth was broken due to the

injuries caused by the accused. Accordingly, Police added Section 326 IPC in the matter in order to make the case non bailable. The applicant is in jail

since 19-01-2021 and thereafter there is no progress in the trial. The conclusion of trial will take a long time. He has been impleaded on the basis of

previous enmity. There is no allegation of causing injury on jaw by rod in the FIR, but later on it has been added and rest of the injuries are simple in

nature. The co-accused Suresh was enlarged on bail on 30.07.2021 by this Court vide MCRC No.37263/21, therefore, learned counsel for the

applicant prays for grant of bail on the ground of parity.

On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer opposes the bail application.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, without commenting on the

merit of the case, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of

Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before that

Court during the pendency of trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

Before releasing the applicant from custody, the jail authorities are directed to medically examine him in order to rule out the possibility of COVID - 19

infections and shall comply with the direction given by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Writ Petition No. 1/2020.

C.c as per rules.