High Courts(1902) 12 MAD CK 0004

Rangan Pattar vs Lakshmi Neithiar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 December 1902 · Citation: (1904) 14 MLJ 137

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 155 words
1.

As regards the first point relied on by the appellant, viz., that no appeal lay from the order of the District Munsif we are concluded by authority.

See the judgment of the Full Bench in Ramaswami Sastrulu, v. Kameswarumma ILR 23 M. 361. The Judgment of the Privy Council in Chowdry

Wahed Ali v. Mussamat Jamee 11 B.L.R. 149 a case in which, in the language of that Judgment, the circumstances were peculiar and exceptional,

is not in conflict with the decision of the Full Bench of this Court.

2.

As regards the facts, it is not necessary to determine whether the burden of proof was on the execution creditor the 6th defend-ant. There is a

finding of fact by the lower appellate Court that the 6th defendant proved chat the property in question formed the tavazhi property of the

defendant. There is evidence to support the finding. The appeal is dismissed with costs.