High CourtsDivision Bench(1928) 01 CAL CK 0034

Ramnarain Roy Chowdhury and Another vs Biswanath Banerjee

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 13 January 1928 · Citation: 112 Ind. Cas. 456

HON’BLE JUDGES
Zahid Suhrawardy, J · Graham, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 140 words
1.

We think that in this matter the proper order to be passed is this: The examination of the petitioner (defendant No. 2 in the suit) will be postponed till the evidence on the side of the plaintiff is closed. Then if the petitioner does not offer herself for examination an the side of the defendants, the plaintiff will be at, liberty to examine her, as his witness. The learned Counsel for the petitioners gives an undertaking that she will be available at Dacca for examination by the plaintiff at the stage that we have indicated. By this order we do not mean to suggest; that he must necessarily be examined. The Rule is made absolute in these terms.

2.

The costs of the "Rule will be costs in the cause. We assess the hearing fee at five gold mohurs.