High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 06 DEL CK 1241

Ramky Infrastructure Limited And ECI Engineering Construction Company Limited (JV) vs National Highways And Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 June 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejas Karia, J
CASE NUMBER
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 230/2025 & I.A. 14735/2025, I.A. 14736/2025 & I.A. 14737/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 283 words

TEJAS KARIA, J. (Oral)

1.

The Petitioner has filed the present Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act’) seeking urgent interim reliefs in relation to a Contract Agreement dated 12.05.2016 (‘Agreement’) entered into between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.1 for the purpose of four-laning of Dimapur – Kohima Road (‘Project’) in the state of Nagaland.

2.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the present Petition has been filed for seeking urgent interim measures against the unilateral and coercive actions of Respondent No.1 in invoking the Performance Bank Guarantee amounting to ₹19.35 crores and initiating termination of the Agreement despite completion of the Project.

3.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has already invoked Arbitration in compliance with the Arbitration Agreement contained under Clause 26.3 of the Agreement and appointed its nominee Arbitrator.

4.

The learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 has entered appearance on advance service and states that Respondent No. 1 has also appointed its nominee Arbitrator and the Performance Bank Guarantee has already been encashed.

5.

After some arguments, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 agree to request the nominee Arbitrators to appoint the Presiding Arbitrator at the earliest and once the Arbitral Tribunal is constituted, the present Petition with any modification and/or addition, as may be necessary, shall be filed before the learned Arbitral Tribunal for consideration under Section 17 of the Act.

6.

At joint request of the parties, the present Petition is disposed of with a liberty to the parties to approach the learned Arbitral Tribunal, once constituted, for the grant of appropriate interim measures.

7.

Pending applications are also disposed of.