High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 07 RAJ CK 0036

Ramesh Chandra vs Ugam Devi And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 12 July 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rekha Borana, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Application No. 32 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 207 words

Rekha Borana, J

1.

An application under Order 13 Rule 9 read with Section 151, CPC has been preferred on behalf of the appellant with a submission that the present second appeal was disposed of in terms of the compromise as entered into between the parties. For the purposes of verification of the compromise, the original Power of Attorney as executed by appellant Ramesh Chandra in favour of Dinesh Chandra Sharma, had been submitted before the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) and the same forms a part of the record.

2.

As now the appeal has been disposed of, the said original Power of Attorney deserves to be returned back to the appellant.

The certified copy of the said Power of Attorney has been placed on record along with the present application.

3.

In view of the submissions made in the application, the same is allowed. It is hereby directed that the original Power of Attorney dated 08.04.2004 executed by Ramesh Chandra Parashar in favour of Dinesh Chandra Sharma be returned back to counsel for the appellant after taking due receipt of the same from him. The certified copy of the Power of Attorney as filed along with the present application be placed on record of the second appeal.