AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 06/2026 of PS Punjabi Bagh for offence under Section 64(2)(m) BNS and Section 6 POCSO Act.
The prosecution case, as culled out of the status report, is as follows. The subject FIR was registered on the basis of statement of prosecutrix, aged 16 years, in which she alleged that her neighbour, the present accused/applicant aged about 37 years raped her repeatedly over a period of time.
On behalf of accused/applicant, it is argued by learned counsel that before the trial court, the prosecutrix turned completely hostile to prosecution case and stated that nothing at all happened with her, therefore, the accused/applicant deserves to be released on bail.
Learned APP for State opposes the bail application on the ground that during investigation, statement of prosecutrix was also recorded under Section 183 BNSS in which she narrated the rape allegations.
It is not a case where the prosecutrix while deposing before the trial court would say that she was involved in a consensual relationship, which argument could be analysed keeping in mind her age. Here is a case in which the prosecutrix during her testimony flatly denied the alleged incident in entirety. Not only this, the prosecutrix even deposed before the trial court that she had never appeared before any judge for recording her statement, which is blatant lie, because according to prosecution, statement of prosecutrix on oath was duly recorded under Section 183 BNSS before the concerned magistrate.
Despite such apparent perjury, the IO opted not to take any action against the prosecutrix. On this issue, it was on an earlier date submitted by learned prosecutor that Section 22(2) of POCSO Act protects the prosecutrix, but the State was contemplating legal action against her, possibly under Section 217 BNS. But even that action has not been taken.
The object of criminal trial is to arrive at the truth and not to ensure conviction only. The court arrives at the truth on the basis of evidence collected by the investigator and adduced by the prosecutor. Often, the criminal justice machinery is criticised for low rate of convictions, especially in cases under the POCSO Act. The investigating and the prosecuting arms of the criminal justice system always blame the witnesses for having turned hostile during trials, leading to the acquittals. But in none of those cases any action is ever taken by them. Even in a case of present nature, where during trial the prosecutrix not just deposed hostile to prosecution case, but even went to the extent of stating before the trial court that she never appeared before the concerned magistrate for recording of her statement purportedly under Section 183 BNSS, no action has been taken against her by prosecution side.
In the present case, it is not just the testimony of the prosecutrix being a blatant lie and hostile to prosecution, but also the total disinterest exhibited by prosecution to take appropriate action, which at this stage would convey to this court that the entire prosecution case was prima facie false and the accused/applicant suffered illegal confinement in custody. However, I must also add a cautious rider that the above observations have been recorded only while analysing the rival case for grant or denial of bail. These observations shall not be read by the trial court to the prejudice of the prosecution side. The trial court shall independently evaluate the material on record and shall arrive at final decision at conclusion of trial.
Considering the above circumstances, I do not find any reason to deprive further liberty to the accused/applicant. Therefore, the bail application is allowed and accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.
