AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
The petitioners have prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider their case for promotion on the post of Adhyapak (Hindia). It is contended that the sole reason for not considering the case of the petitioners for promotion is that the respondents treated them to be Teachers of Arts Faculty and did not consider them to be teachers of subject of Hindi. By taking this Court to Annexure-R/1 dated 08.03.2016, it is submitted that the respondents have realized the said difficulty and they have decided to convene a DPC for the purpose of examining the aspect of rectification of Subject in relation to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents may be directed to complete the said exercise within a stipulated time.
Shri Yadav, learned Govt. Advocate submitted his argument on the basis of reply. By taking this Court to para 4 of the return, it is submitted that final promotion list was issued on 08.08.2015. The persons, who are senior to the petitioners, were given promotion.
The petitioners' entry in the application shows that they belong to Arts Subject. However, a meeting was convened on 08.03.2016 and it was held as under:
"VERNACULAR MATTER OMITTED"
Since a decision has already been taken that as per the Degree of Graduation, the subject of petitioners needs to be corrected and the matter needs proper consideration, I deem it proper to direct the respondents to take a final decision about change of subject of petitioners and about their reconsideration for promotion. The entire exercise be completed within 90 days from the date of communication of this order. If the petitioners are found eligible and fit for promotion, necessary promotion orders be passed within aforesaid time. If they decide otherwise, a reasoned order be passed and communicated to the petitioners.
Petition is disposed of without expressing any view on the merits of the case.