High CourtsSingle Bench(2014) 01 BOM CK 0114

Ramchand Gopaldas Paryani vs Shafiq Ahmad Shaikh Abbas and Another

Bombay High Court · Decided on 9 January 2014 · Citation: (2014) 1 BomCR(Cri) 615

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.M. Thipsay, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Application No. 3425 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 165 words

A.M. Thipsay, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This is an application for leave to appeal against acquittal. The applicant claims to be a victim of the alleged offences. The appeal is, purportedly, being filed under the proviso to section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "the Code"). The order of acquittal was passed by the Court of a Magistrate. The proviso to section 372 of the Code clearly lays down that an appeal against acquittal contemplated therein shall lie to the Court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction. From the order of conviction recorded by a Magistrate, appeal lies to the Court of Sessions. Therefore, victim''s appeal against an order of acquittal shall lie to the Court of Sessions.

2.

Consequently, the criminal application for leave to file an appeal cannot be entertained by this Court. The application is dismissed, with liberty to the applicant to file sin appeal in the Court of Sessions.