High Courts(1902) 11 MAD CK 0008

Ramaswamy Iyah and Another vs Kuppusawmi Iyah and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 November 1902 · Citation: (1903) 13 MLJ 351

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 84 words
1.

We concur with the learned Chief Justice in his construction of Section 96 of the Indian Succession Act. Section 128 implies that the executor

survives the testator. It, therefore, cannot apply to a case where the executor predeceases the testator. That section, therefore, does not affect the

case contemplated by Section 96. This latter section can only apply to a case where the legatee predeceases the testator, whether he has been

named an executor or not.

2.

We dismiss the appeal with costs.