High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 03 UK CK 0013

Ramanand vs District Magistrate and Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 21 March 2002 · Citation: (2002) 5 AWC 4092 : (2003) 1 UC 451 : (2002) 1 UC 567

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C.Verma, J · Irshad Hussain, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 104 (M/B) of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 184 words

P.C. Verma and Irshad Hussain, JJ.—This writ petition has been issued against the citation notice issued against the Petitioner.

2.

The Petitioner was guarantor of Mukhtyar Masih, who took agricultural loan of which recovery is going on against him. He has moved the application to the D.M. that he is ready to pay the entire amount as is evident from Annexure-3 of the writ petition. Since the principal debtor is ready to pay the entire due, it was not proper for the authorities to proceed against the guarantor. The guarantor can be proceeded with only when the principal debtor was not available and was not in a position to pay the debt.

3.

Here in the present case, the principal debtor has applied to the Collector to recover dues by sale of mortgaged property. Under these circumstances, citation issued against the Petitioner cannot be sustained. Therefore, the citation issued against the Petitioner is quashed.

4.

However, if the amount is not recovered from the principal debtor, it is open for the authorities to proceed against the guarantor.

5.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.