High CourtsDivision Bench(1891) 11 MAD CK 0019

Raman vs Chandan and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 November 1891 · Citation: (1892) ILR (Mad) 219

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wilkinson, J · Arthur J.H. Collins, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 140 words
1.

The District Judge was in error in holding that Section 59 of Act II of 1864 applied to the suit, inasmuch as the sale by the Collector was not a

proceeding under the Act, as there is no provision in Act II of 1864 for treating the sum payable for plaintiff as revenue. The sale was ultra vires,

and plaintiff had twelve years within which to bring his suit. We set aside the decree of the lower Appellate Court and restore that of the Munsif.

Appellant will be entitled to his costs in the lower Appellate Court. There will be no costs in this Court the decree of the lower Appellate Court

and restore that of the Munsif. Appellant will be entitled to his costs in the lower Appellate Court.

2.

There will be no costs in this Court.