High CourtsDivision Bench(1903) 11 MAD CK 0018

Ramachandra Aiyar vs Subramania Chettiar and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 November 1903 · Citation: (1904) 14 MLJ 393

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhashyam Aiyangar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 91 words

Bhashyam Aiyangar, J.—There is no provision of law which requires the Court to recognize the validity of the transfer of a decree before the

transferee can apply u/s 232, C.P.C., to exe-cute the decree. The only application which a transferee who, according to the definition of the term

decree-holder is himself a decree-holder, can make is an application u/s 232, C.P.C., for execution of the decree and he cannot make an

application to the Court merely for recognizing him as transferee of the decree. The revision petitions are dismissed with costs.