High CourtsDivision Bench(2001) 03 AHC CK 0112

Rama Kant and Another vs State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 1 March 2001 · Citation: (2001) CriLJ 2072

HON’BLE JUDGES
Onkareshwar Bhatt, J · M. Katju, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
C.M.W.P. No. 894 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 281 words
1.

This writ petition has been filed against the impugned F.I.R. dated 2-2-2001 (Annexure 1 to the writ petition), in case crime No. 32 of 2001, u/s 394 IPC, Police Station G.R.P., Banda. The aforesaid F.I.R. reads as follows :-

2.

The aforesaid First Information Report shows that the allegation is that two G.R.P. personnel beat up and robbed a sum of Rs. 50/- from the complainant and they also robbed other persons. It is a strange state of affairs in our country that some police personnel who are supposed to be the protectors of the people have themselves become like bandits and thieves. A large number of cases are coming before us where the complaints against the police personnel are that they are robbing persons or extracting money from them forcibly. What kind of society is this where a Rakshak has become a Bhakshak? This is not an isolated case but these complaints are coming regularly in various cases which are being filed before us.

3.

The duty of the police personnel is to protect the public and not to loot them. This Court is now going to take a serious view against police personnel who are committing dacoity or theft against the people. All those police personnel who are found guilty of such offences will be severely punished.

4.

We are not inclined to quash the First Information Report in the present case. However, we direct that the bail application of the petitioners in the aforesaid case be decided by the Court concerned expeditiously. The observations in this judgment will not influence the Court hearing the bail application or the trial.

5.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.