High CourtsDivision Bench(1886) 02 CAL CK 0003

Ram Sunder De vs Rajab Ali and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 16 February 1886 · Citation: (1885) ILR (Cal) 558

HON’BLE JUDGES
McDonell, J · Beverley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 143 words

McDonell and Beverley, JJ.—Without going into the question whether or not any criminal offence has been committed, we think that the order of the Bench acquitting the accused must be set aside on the ground that no member of that Bench was a member of the Bench which heard the evidence for the prosecution in the case. The trial was a summary one in which the evidence is not recorded at any length, and it was, therefore, the more necessary that the case should have been disposed of by one or more Magistrates before whom the witnesses had been examined. We accordingly set aside the order of dismissal, and direct that the matter be tried de novo, or, if possible, disposed of by a Bench of whom one or more of the Magistrates who heard the evidence for the prosecutions shall be members.